scholarly journals Real Effects of Search Frictions in Consumer Credit Markets

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bronson Argyle ◽  
Taylor Nadauld ◽  
Christopher Palmer
Author(s):  
Stefan Gissler ◽  
Rodney Ramcharan ◽  
Edison Yu

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres Liberman ◽  
Christopher Neilson ◽  
Luis Opazo ◽  
Seth Zimmerman

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (11) ◽  
pp. 5378-5415
Author(s):  
Stefan Gissler ◽  
Rodney Ramcharan ◽  
Edison Yu

Abstract This paper finds that banks and nonbanks respond differently to increased competition in consumer credit markets. Increased competition and a greater threat of failure induces banks to specialize in relationship business lending, and surviving banks are more profitable. However, nonbanks change their credit policy when faced with more competition and expand credit to riskier borrowers at the extensive margin, resulting in higher default rates. These results show how the effects of competition depend on the form of intermediation. They also suggest that increased competition can cause credit risk to migrate outside the traditional supervisory umbrella.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiantian Dai ◽  
Xiangbo Liu ◽  
Wei Sun

Abstract This paper explores both the long-run and short-run effects of monetary policy on input inventories in a search model with monetary propagation and two-stage production. Inventories arise endogenously due to search frictions. In the long run, we analytically show that an increase in the money growth rate has hump-shaped real effects on steady-state input inventory investment, input inventory-to-sales ratio as well as sales. These effects are driven by both the extensive and intensive margins in the finished goods market. We then calibrate the model to the US data to study the short-run effects of monetary policy. We first show that our model can reproduce the stylized facts of input inventories quite well and then find that input inventories amplify aggregate fluctuations over business cycles.


2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 256-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Will Dobbie ◽  
Paige Marta Skiba

Information asymmetries are prominent in theory but difficult to estimate. This paper exploits discontinuities in loan eligibility to test for moral hazard and adverse selection in the payday loan market. Regression discontinuity and regression kink approaches suggest that payday borrowers are less likely to default on larger loans. A $50 larger payday loan leads to a 17 to 33 percent drop in the probability of default. Conversely, there is economically and statistically significant adverse selection into larger payday loans when loan eligibility is held constant. Payday borrowers who choose a $50 larger loan are 16 to 47 percent more likely to default. (JEL D14, D82, G21)


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres Liberman ◽  
Christopher Neilson ◽  
Luis Opazo ◽  
Seth D. Zimmerman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document