Faculty Opinions recommendation of Effect of cricoid pressure compared with a sham procedure in the rapid sequence induction of anesthesia: the IRIS randomized clinical trial.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Basem Abdelmalak
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Cricoid Pressure ◽  
Rapid Sequence Induction ◽  
Sham Procedure ◽  
Rapid Sequence ◽  
Sequence Induction

scholarly journals Effect of Cricoid Pressure Compared With a Sham Procedure in the Rapid Sequence Induction of Anesthesia

JAMA Surgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 154 (1) ◽  
pp. 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aurélie Birenbaum ◽  
David Hajage ◽  
Sabine Roche ◽  
Alexandre Ntouba ◽  
Mathilde Eurin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cricoid Pressure ◽  
Rapid Sequence Induction ◽  
Sham Procedure ◽  
Rapid Sequence ◽  
Sequence Induction

scholarly journals Rapid sequence induction: where did the consensus go?

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascale Avery ◽  
Sarah Morton ◽  
James Raitt ◽  
Hans Morten Lossius ◽  
David Lockey
Keyword(s):  
Cricoid Pressure ◽  
Rapid Sequence Induction ◽  
Hospital Environment ◽  
Training Technique ◽  
Rapid Sequence ◽  
Gastric Aspiration ◽  
Sequence Induction ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Key Aspects ◽  
Risk Of Aspiration

Abstract Background Rapid Sequence Induction (RSI) was introduced to minimise the risk of aspiration of gastric contents during emergency tracheal intubation. It consisted of induction with the use of thiopentone and suxamethonium with the application of cricoid pressure. This narrative review describes how traditional RSI has been modified in the UK and elsewhere, aiming to deliver safe and effective emergency anaesthesia outside the operating room environment. Most of the key aspects of traditional RSI – training, technique, drugs and equipment have been challenged and often significantly changed since the procedure was first described. Alterations have been made to improve the safety and quality of the intervention while retaining the principles of rapidly securing a definitive airway and avoiding gastric aspiration. RSI is no longer achieved by an anaesthetist alone and can be delivered safely in a variety of settings, including in the pre-hospital environment. Conclusion The conduct of RSI in current emergency practice is far removed from the original descriptions of the procedure. Despite this, the principles – rapid delivery of a definitive airway and avoiding aspiration, are still highly relevant and the indications for RSI remain relatively unchanged.

scholarly journals Audit on Current Practice of Rapid Sequence Induction and Intubation of Anesthesia in the University of Gondar Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia, 2018

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Mamaru Mollalign ◽  
Amare Hailekiros Gebreegzi ◽  
Habtamu Getinet ◽  
Seid Adem
Keyword(s):  
Cricoid Pressure ◽  
Rapid Sequence Induction ◽  
Northwest Ethiopia ◽  
Pulmonary Aspiration ◽  
Airway Control ◽  
Elective Surgical Procedures ◽  
Rapid Sequence ◽  
Audit Period ◽  
Sequence Induction ◽  
The University

Background. In patients who are liable to the risk of pulmonary aspiration, airway control is the primary and first concern for the anesthetists both in emergency and elective surgical procedures. Rapid sequence induction is universally required in any occasion of emergent endotracheal intubation needed for unfasted patients or patients’ fasting status is unknown. Methods. institutional-based prospective observational study was conducted from December 2017 to January 2018 in all elective and emergency adult or pediatric patients with a risk of pulmonary aspiration who were operated under general anesthesia with rapid sequence induction and intubation during the audit period. Result. A total of 35 patients were operated during the study period. Of these, 31 (88.57%) patients were adults and 4 (11.43%) patients were pediatrics. Most of the patients were emergency (29 (82.857%)), and the rest were elective (6 (17.142%)). Conclusion. Most anesthetists were good at preparing all available monitoring and drugs, making sure that IV line is well-functioning, preparing suction with a suction machine, preoxygenation, application of cricoid pressure, and checking the position of the ETT after intubation was performed. Preparing difficult airway equipment during planning of rapid sequence induction and intubation, giving roles and told to proceed their assigned role for the team, attempt to ventilate with a small tidal volume, and routine use of bougie or stylet to increase the chance of success of intubation needed improvement.

scholarly journals Rapid sequence induction/intubation controversies

2020 ◽  
pp. 102490792091083
Author(s):  
Prihatma Kriswidyatomo ◽  
Maharani Pradnya Paramitha
Keyword(s):  
Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Cricoid Pressure ◽  
Rapid Sequence Induction ◽  
Blocking Agent ◽  
Neuromuscular Blocking ◽  
Neuromuscular Blocking Agent ◽  
Rapid Sequence Intubation ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Rapid Sequence ◽  
Sequence Induction

Backgrounds: Since its first definition and publication on 1970, Rapid Sequence Induction / Intubation (RSI) technique has been accepted globally as the “standard” for doing rapid intubation after induction of anesthesia for patients with high risk of aspiration, especially in emergency situation. However, this technique is not so much a “standard” as there are numerous variations on its practice based on national surveys. Anesthesia providers have their own opinions on the practice of RSI components which need to be discussed to assess their advantages and disadvantages, while there has been no review article which discussed these controversies in the last ten years. Objectives: To review the technique differences within RSI protocols. Methods: Online databases were searched, including MEDLINE and COCHRANE for each step in the original RSI protocol using keywords such as: “rapid sequence induction” or “rapid sequence intubation” or “RSI” and “controversies” or “head position” or “cricoid pressure” or “neuromuscular blocking agent” or “NMBA” or positive pressure ventilation” or “PPV”; and so on. Articles were then sorted out based on relevancy. Results and conclusion: Supported by new evidence, RSI practices may differ in: the positioning of patient, choices of induction agent, application of cricoid pressure, choices of neuromuscular blocking agent, and the use of positive pressure ventilation. A more updated and standardized guideline should be established by referring and evaluating to these controversies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document