Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA) for Postoperative Pain Relief: What Have We Learned and Where Do We Go From Here?

Analgesia ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annie Woodhouse ◽  
Laurence E. Mather
1997 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Ku Hwang ◽  
Seung Joon Lee ◽  
Ho Yeong Kil ◽  
Sung Woo Lee ◽  
Young Joon Yoon ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Suzanne Chapman

The landmark paper discussed in this chapter is ‘Patient-controlled analgesia: A new concept of postoperative pain relief’, published by Bennett et al. in 1982. This paper presents data from two investigations in which patient-controlled analgesia using morphine was evaluated in patients who had undergone elective gastric bypass surgery for the management of morbid obesity. The paper shows that patient-controlled analgesia achieved adequate analgesia more often than conventional intermittent analgesia did when both administration methods were compared, but with less sedation. In addition, patients who had experienced both methods of analgesia felt that patient-controlled analgesia was superior. The paper also demonstrates that individuals can vary in their analgesic requirements.


2005 ◽  
Vol 102 (5) ◽  
pp. 1014-1022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugene R. Viscusi ◽  
Gavin Martin ◽  
Craig T. Hartrick ◽  
Neil Singla ◽  
Garen Manvelian ◽  
...  

Background Epidural morphine has proven analgesic efficacy in the postoperative period and is widely used. This study evaluated the efficacy of extended-release epidural morphine (EREM; DepoDur; Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Chadds Ford, PA; SkyePharma, Inc., San Diego, CA) in providing pain relief for 48 h after surgery. Methods Patients (n = 200) scheduled to undergo total hip arthroplasty were randomized to receive a single dose of 15, 20, or 25 mg EREM or placebo. After surgery and after asking for pain medication, patients had access to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia fentanyl for breakthrough pain as needed. Postoperative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia fentanyl use, time to first postoperative fentanyl use, pain intensity at rest and with activity, patient and surgeon ratings of pain control, and adverse events were recorded. Results All EREM dosages reduced the mean (+/- SD) fentanyl use versus placebo (510 +/- 708 vs. 2,091 +/- 1,803 microg; P < 0.0001) and delayed the median time to first dose of fentanyl (21.3 vs. 3.6 h; P < 0.0001). All EREM groups had significantly improved pain control at rest through 48 h postdose (area under the curve [0-48 h]) compared with placebo (P < 0.0005). More EREM-treated patients rated their pain control as good or very good compared with placebo (at 24 h: 90 vs. 65%, P < 0.0001; at 48 h: 83 vs. 67%, P < 0.05). No supplemental analgesia was needed in 25% of EREM-treated patients and 2% of placebo-treated patients at 48 h (P < 0.05). The safety profile of EREM was consistent with that of other epidurally administered opioid analgesics. Conclusions EREM provided significant postoperative pain relief over a 48-h period after hip surgery, without the need for indwelling epidural catheters.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document