scholarly journals An Important Problem in Physician-Patient Relationship: Burnout and Factors Affecing Burnout in Family Physicians

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 705-713
Author(s):  
Mustafa SAMANCI ◽  
Elif DİKMETAŞ YARDAN
1996 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 539-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger C. Katz

The physician-patient relationship is an important part of medical care. This study examined events that can jeopardize that relationship, i.e., patients' behaviors and attributes that physicians find frustrating. Data were collected from practicing family physicians ( N = 34) using a 32-item questionnaire developed by the author. Items were drawn from previous research on the behaviors of difficult patients and checked for relevance by two family physicians before the study began. Coefficient alpha was .92. Participants were predominantly male physicians who had been in practice for an average of 18 years. They were asked to indicate if they found specific patients' characteristics frustrating or annoying by using a 9-point scale with end-points of “not at all frustrating or annoying” (1) and “very frustrating or annoying” (9). The physicians rated half of the listed patients' attributes as at least moderately frustrating (mean rating >6). Over 80% of the physicians were frustrated by patients who expected a “cure,” brought up new symptoms at the last moment, appeared to be malingering, or refused to take responsibility for their health. They were least frustrated by disease-related conditions such as degenerative or chronic illnesses. The physicians' ratings were unrelated to their years of experience. Results are discussed in relation to changing disease patterns which have occurred in this country over the last half-century.


2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi Anolli ◽  
Fabrizia Mantovani ◽  
Alessia Agliati ◽  
Olivia Realdon ◽  
Valentino Zurloni ◽  
...  

1987 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fran Carnerie

AbstractMany individuals develop a temporary state of cognitive and emotional impairment after being diagnosed with catastrophic illness. Thus, when crucial decisions about medical treatment are required, they are unable to assimilate information; or worse, the legal need to be informed can rival a psychological desire to not be informed. The Canadian informed consent doctrine is unresponsive to crisis and clinically impracticable, and so paradoxically compromises the integrity and autonomy it was designed to protect. Many aspects of the physician-patient relationship and clinical setting also undermine the philosophical values enshrined in this doctrine. This further jeopardizes the individual's integrity. The Article explores proposals for change such as delaying the informing and consenting, improving the concept of consent, and improving the role of the physician.


2021 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2020-002764
Author(s):  
Catherine Owusuaa ◽  
Irene van Beelen ◽  
Agnes van der Heide ◽  
Carin C D van der Rijt

ObjectivesAccurate assessment that a patient is in the last phase of life is a prerequisite for timely initiation of palliative care in patients with a life-limiting disease, such as advanced cancer or advanced organ failure. Several palliative care quality standards recommend the surprise question (SQ) to identify those patients. Little is known about physicians’ views on identifying and disclosing the last phase of life of patients with different illness trajectories.MethodsData from two focus groups were analysed using thematic analysis with a phenomenological approach.ResultsFifteen medical specialists and general practitioners participated. Participants thought prediction of patients’ last phase of life, i.e. expected death within 1 year, is important. They seemed to find that prediction is more difficult in patients with advanced organ failure compared with cancer. The SQ was considered a useful prognostic tool; its use is facilitated by its simplicity but hampered by its subjective character. The medical specialist was considered mainly responsible for prognosticating and gradually disclosing the last phase. Participants’ reluctance to such disclosure was related to uncertainty around prognostication, concerns about depriving patients of hope, affecting the physician–patient relationship, or a lack of time or availability of palliative care services.ConclusionsPhysicians consider the assessment of patients’ last phase of life important and support use of the SQ in patients with different illness trajectories. However, barriers in disclosing expected death are prognostic uncertainty, possible deprivation of hope, physician–patient relationship, and lack of time or palliative care services. Future studies should examine patients’ preferences for those discussions.


1988 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert R. Jonsen

The activity of prescribing therapeutic drugs is one of the most significant features of the physician-patient relationship. This activity must be understood in moral, as well as technical terms. The ancient Greek word for drug had three meanings, providing the outline for an ethics of medication: remedy, poison and magical charm. Corresponding to these three meanings are three ethical principles: competence in therapeutic application, avoidance of harm and honesty.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document