Fieldwork in Business Contexts

Go-along interviews, also known as walk-along interviews, involve interviewers and interviewees moving through an environment that has relevance for the specific interview in question. These types of interviews are useful in many different business contexts. From a communication perspective, this form of interviewing also represents the most extreme form of interviewing practice. The physical environment effectively becomes a participant in the developing interview, shaping the interview by “suggesting” new topics or imposing thematic constraints on the interview. Any transcript reflects this shaping through references to its wider world. From the perspective of communication, the physical environment—natural or built—imposes specific situations with respect to communication that can, in turn, be used to trigger certain factual and narrative canonical genres. These communicative situations link to relevant textual strategies and canonical genres as well as situational information that can be recovered. They also provide engagement practices for go-along interviews and interviewing.

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 176-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
John F. Rauthmann

Abstract. There is as yet no consensually agreed-upon situational taxonomy. The current work addresses this issue and reviews extant taxonomic approaches by highlighting a “road map” of six research stations that lead to the observed diversity in taxonomies: (1) theoretical and conceptual guidelines, (2) the “type” of situational information studied, (3) the general taxonomic approach taken, (4) the generation of situation pools, (5) the assessment and rating of situational information, and (6) the statistical analyses of situation data. Current situational taxonomies are difficult to integrate because they follow different paths along these six stations. Some suggestions are given on how to spur integrated taxonomies toward a unified psychology of situations that speaks a common language.


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isaac Munene

Abstract. The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) methodology was applied to accident reports from three African countries: Kenya, Nigeria, and South Africa. In all, 55 of 72 finalized reports for accidents occurring between 2000 and 2014 were analyzed. In most of the accidents, one or more human factors contributed to the accident. Skill-based errors (56.4%), the physical environment (36.4%), and violations (20%) were the most common causal factors in the accidents. Decision errors comprised 18.2%, while perceptual errors and crew resource management accounted for 10.9%. The results were consistent with previous industry observations: Over 70% of aviation accidents have human factor causes. Adverse weather was seen to be a common secondary casual factor. Changes in flight training and risk management methods may alleviate the high number of accidents in Africa.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleni Nasiopoulos ◽  
Agnes Cywinska ◽  
Thariq Badiudeen ◽  
Alan Kingstone

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document