Rewiring the upper limb: Motor nerve transfer surgery in the reconstruction of paralysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Mohammad Nassimizadeh ◽  
Dominic Power ◽  
Davina Cavallaro ◽  
Pieter Jordaan ◽  
Petros Mikalef
2015 ◽  
Vol 136 (3) ◽  
pp. 344e-352e ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen M. Davidge ◽  
Andrew Yee ◽  
Amy M. Moore ◽  
Susan E. Mackinnon

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfio Luca Costa ◽  
Paolo Titolo ◽  
Bruno Battiston ◽  
Mariarosaria Galeano ◽  
Michele Rosario Colonna
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Chau Y. Tai ◽  
Thomas H. Tung ◽  
Terence M. Myckatyn ◽  
Susan E. Mackinnon
Keyword(s):  

Hand ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 84S-85S
Author(s):  
Joseph Ward ◽  
Mohammad Nassimizadeh ◽  
Simon Tan ◽  
Dominic Power

Hand ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 155894472092848
Author(s):  
Graham J. McLeod ◽  
Blair R. Peters ◽  
Tanis Quaife ◽  
Tod A. Clark ◽  
Jennifer L. Giuffre

Background: Transfer of the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) into the ulnar motor branch improves intrinsic hand function in patients with high ulnar nerve injuries. We report our outcomes of this nerve transfer and hypothesize that any improvement in intrinsic hand function is beneficial to patients. Methods: A retrospective review of all AIN-to-ulnar motor nerve transfers, including both supercharged end-to-side (SETS) and end-to-end (ETE) transfers, from 2011 to 2018 performed by 2 surgeons was conducted. All adult patients who underwent this nerve transfer for any reason with greater than 6 months’ follow-up and completed charts were included. Primary outcome measures were motor function using the British Medical Research Council (BMRC) grading system and subjective satisfaction with surgery using a visual analog scale. Secondary outcome measures included complications and donor site deficits. Results: Of the 57 patients who underwent nerve transfer, 32 patients met the inclusion criteria. The average follow-up and average time to surgery were 12 and 15.6 months, respectively. The overall average BMRC score was 2.9/5, with a trend toward better recovery in patients who received earlier surgery (<12 months = BMRC 3.7, ≥12 months = BMRC 2.2; P < .01). Patients with an SETS transfer had better results that those with an ETE transfer (SETS = 3.2, ETE = 2.6). There were no donor deficits after operation. One patient developed complex regional pain syndrome. Conclusions: Patients with earlier surgery and an in-continuity nerve (receiving an SETS transfer) showed improved recovery with a higher BMRC grade compared with those who underwent later surgery. Any improvements in intrinsic hand function would be beneficial to patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 743-750
Author(s):  
Abdus S. Burahee ◽  
Andrew D. Sanders ◽  
Colin Shirley ◽  
Dominic M. Power

Cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) is the second most common compression neuropathy of the upper limb, presenting with disturbance of ulnar nerve sensory and motor function. The ulnar nerve may be dynamically compressed during movement, statically compressed due to reduction in tunnel volume or compliance, and tension forces may cause ischaemia or render the nerve susceptible to subluxation, further causing local swelling, compression inflammation and fibrosis. Superiority of one surgical technique for the management of CuTS has not been demonstrated. Different techniques are selected for different clinical situations with simple decompression being the most common procedure due to its efficacy and low complication rate. Adjunctive distal nerve transfer for denervated muscles using an expendable motor nerve to restore the axon population in the distal nerve is in its infancy but may provide a solution for severe intrinsic weakness or paralysis. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:743-750. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200129


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document