scholarly journals Late Relapse and Follow-up Protocols in Testicular Germ Cell Tumours: The Edinburgh Cancer Centre Experience and Review of the Literature

2008 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. CMO.S321
Author(s):  
Beatrice Detti ◽  
Paul A. Elliott ◽  
Duncan B. Mclaren ◽  
Grahame C.W. Howard

Aims To identify clinicopathological features and outcomes in patients with late relapse (LR) of testicular germ cell tumours (GCTs) in order to guide follow-up policy. Materials and Methods The Edinburgh Cancer Centre (ECC) database identified all patients diagnosed with testicular GCT between 1988 and 2002. Of 703 patients, six relapsed more than 24 months after their initial treatment. A retrospective casenote review was performed to extract clinical, pathological, treatment and outcome data. Results Six patients (0.85%) underwent late relapse. All patients presented initially with stage I disease and five were classified as good risk (International Germ Cell Consensus Classification, IGCCC). Median time to LR was 31 months. Two patients had previously relapsed less than 24 months from initial diagnosis. Markers at the time of relapse were normal in all patients. In all cases of late relapse disease was confined to axial lymphadenopathy. Three patients were treated with chemotherapy alone, two patients underwent surgical resection and one patient received combined treatment. All patients obtained a complete response and all remain disease free with a median follow-up of 52 months. Conclusions The incidence of late relapse in this series is low. Chemo-naive patients with LR were successfully salvaged with chemotherapy alone and patients previously exposed to cisplatin-based chemotherapy were salvaged with complete surgical excision. The optimal length of follow-up in patients with testicular germ cell tumours is not known and practice varies widely. In this cohort of 703 patients, only one patient who relapsed was picked up by additional clinic follow-up between 5 and 10 years. Thus, on the basis of this small series, the authors suggest that follow-up after five years may not be justified.

2007 ◽  
Vol 93 (5) ◽  
pp. 428-431
Author(s):  
Beatrice Detti ◽  
Lorenzo Livi ◽  
Silvia Scoccianti ◽  
Icro Meattini ◽  
Mauro Gacci ◽  
...  

Aims and Background Analysis of patients with late relapse of testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs) with reports on clinicopathological features and outcomes. Methods We identified all patients diagnosed with testicular GCTs at our Institute between 1988 and 2004 who developed relapse ≥24 months after completion of primary therapy. A retrospective case-note review was performed to extract clinical, pathological, treatment and outcome data. Results Six patients (1.25%) developed late relapse. All patients presented with stage I disease and were classified as “good risk” according to the International Germ Cell Consensus Classification. Mean time to late relapse was 48 months. Markers at late relapse were normal in all patients. Relapse was confined to retroperitoneal sites in five patients and located in the mediastinum in one patient. Five patients were managed by chemotherapy alone while one underwent combined treatment with surgery followed by chemotherapy. All patients obtained a complete response and all remained free from recurrence with a mean follow-up of 115 months. Conclusions The incidence of late relapse in this small series is low. Chemonaive patients with late relapse were successfully salvaged with chemotherapy alone or surgical excision followed by cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The optimal duration of follow-up in patients with testicular GCTs is not known and practice varies widely. At our Institute we advise lifelong follow-up of all patients with malignant GCTs of the testis.


2007 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramachandran Venkitaraman ◽  
Bernadette Johnson ◽  
Robert A. Huddart ◽  
Chris C. Parker ◽  
Alan Horwich ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 320
Author(s):  
R.J. Hoekstra ◽  
M. Schaapveld ◽  
A.W. Van Den Belt-Dusebout ◽  
R. De Wit ◽  
J.A. Gietema ◽  
...  

Urology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 163
Author(s):  
R. Richardson ◽  
A.E. Boeken Kruger ◽  
G. Stapper ◽  
M.T.W. Lock ◽  
J.L.H. Bosch

2003 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
P. Albers ◽  
M. Lipphardt ◽  
S.C. Müller

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document