Evaluation of Rotation Reduction Features in Infant and Extended-Use Convertible Child Restraint Systems during Frontal and Rear Impacts

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Declan A. Patton ◽  
Aditya N. Belwadi ◽  
Jalaj Maheshwari ◽  
Kristy B. Arbogast
Keyword(s):  
2013 ◽  
Vol 333-335 ◽  
pp. 2101-2104
Author(s):  
Zhi Xin Liu ◽  
Yu Bing Zhang ◽  
Ming Jiang Wei ◽  
Yue Zhang

Although accident analysis shows that side impact accidents continue to be dangerous for children in cars, the majority technical regulations of Child Restraint Systems (CRS) are focused on the crash performance under the frontal and rear impacts and do not include a side impact test, the main reason is that no good method to test side impact performance of CRS has been agreed on yet in the world. In this paper one side impact test method based on double sled concept is presented and realized. And several CRS models are tested; injury response values are measured from child dummy. It is observed that the sled buck concept is repeatable and able to distinguish preliminarily between CRS models.


Author(s):  
Kenneth J. Saczalski ◽  
Joseph Lawson Burton ◽  
Paul R. Lewis ◽  
Keith Friedman ◽  
Todd K. Saczalski

Since 1996 the NHTSA has warned of the airbag deployment injury risk to front seated children and infants, during frontal impact, and they have recommended that children be placed in the rear seating areas of motor vehicles. However, during most rear impacts the adult occupied front seats will collapse into the rear occupant area and, as such, pose another potentially serious injury risk to the rear seated children and infants who are located on rear seats that are not likely to collapse. Also, in the case of higher speed rear impacts, intrusion of the occupant compartment may cause the child to be shoved forward into the rearward collapsing front seat occupant thereby increasing impact forces to the trapped child. This study summarizes the results of more than a dozen actual accident cases involving over 2-dozen rear-seated children, where 7 children received fatal injuries, and the others received injuries ranging from severely disabling to minor injury. Types of injuries include, among others: crushed skulls and brain damage; ruptured hearts; broken and bruised legs; and death by post-crash fires when the children became entrapped behind collapsed front seat systems. Several rear-impact crash tests, utilizing sled-bucks and vehicle-to-vehicle tests, are used to examine the effects of front seat strength and various types of child restraint systems, such as booster seats and child restraint seats (both forward and rearward facing), in relation to injury potential of rear seated children and infants. The tests utilized sedan and minivan type vehicles that were subjected to speed changes ranging from about 20 to 50 kph (12 to 30 mph), with an average G level per speed change of about 9 to 15. The results indicate that children and infants seated behind a collapsing driver seat, even in low severity rear impacts of less than 25 kph, encounter a high risk of serious or fatal injury, whether or not rear intrusion takes place. Children seated in other rear seat positions away from significant front seat collapse, such as behind the stronger “belt-integrated” types of front seats or rearward but in between occupied collapsing front seat positions, are less likely to be as seriously injured.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document