Max Weber and the Path from Political Economy to Economic Sociology

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Adair-Toteff
2000 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 368
Author(s):  
Gary G. Hamilton ◽  
Richard Swedberg
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 5-18
Author(s):  
Alpár Losoncz

Karl Polanyi’s works have been widely thematized regarding the transition in Central and Eastern Europe. The transition was viewed as the “second great transformation”. Polanyi’s works undoubtedly have numerous followers and it is owing to them that his works have started to be critically interpreted. We are here considering the possibility of reconceptualization of the works after the crisis of neoliberalism. The paper consists of three parts, each focusing on the selected points of Polanyi’s work. In the first part, the goal was to confront Polanyi’s thought with the consequences of neoliberalism; this part is explicitly involved in politicaleconomic reflection. The second part focuses on the discussion about the meaning of embeddedness, and the third part shows the relevance of some reflexions with respect to the money. The second and third part make a dialogue between political economy and economic sociology, economic anthropology, and economic theory.


Author(s):  
Richard Swedberg

This article discusses the tool kit of economic sociology. It begins by examining two of the most important concepts in modern economic sociology, namely: embeddedness and field. It is followed by a discussion of a sociological concept of interest and an interest-based concept of institutions. The article also presents some arguments posed in the text, one of which states that economic sociology would do well in some respects to follow the example of political economy and pay more attention to analytical economics and its general approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document