scholarly journals Midterm outcomes after arthroscopic repair of partial rotator cuff tears: A retrospective study of correlation between partial tear types and surgical technique

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulunay Kanatli ◽  
◽  
Tacettin Ayanoglu ◽  
Muhammet Baybars Ataoglu ◽  
Mustafa Ozer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Arthroscopic Repair ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Partial Tear

Arthroscopic Repair of Anterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears Combined With Open Biceps Tenodesis

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 1667-1674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shane J. Nho ◽  
Rachel M. Frank ◽  
Stefanie N. Reiff ◽  
Nikhil N. Verma ◽  
Anthony A. Romeo
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Arthroscopic Repair ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Biceps Tenodesis

scholarly journals 702 The Role of Scapular Morphology in Traumatic Rotator Cuff Tears and Greater Tuberosity Fractures: A Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
K de Stadler ◽  
O Musbahi ◽  
E Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
High Reliability ◽  
Outcome Measurement ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Treatment Pathways ◽  
Greater Tuberosity ◽  
Patient Pathways

Abstract Aim Traumatic Rotator Cuff Tears(RCT) and Greater Tuberosity fractures(GT) are associated with high morbidity and reduced quality of life. Diagnostic and treatment pathways for both RCT and GT fractures are different. In this study we look at whether scapular morphology features can aid in our understanding of these traumatic injuries and influence patient pathways. Method A retrospective study was conducted at 2 hospitals. All patients between the period of 2010 and 2020 with Traumatic GT fractures or RCT were identified. Patients were case matched by age and laterality of injury. Primary outcome measurement was the Critical Shoulder Angle(CSA) and timing to further imaging. Statistical analysis was conducted using STATA™. Results Eighty patients met the inclusion criteria(40 traumatic RCT and 40 GT). Mean age was 61.8 years with 58(72.5%) left sided injuries. The difference between RCT and GT was 3.96 degrees(95% CI 2.5 to 5.41, p < 0.05). An CSA of 33.73 gave a sensitivity of 0.68 and a specificity of 0.8 to differentiate between RCT and GT fractures. The Area under the Curve(AUC) was 0.8 indicating high reliability. The overall difference in presentation to further scan between the 2 groups was 78. 3 days( P < 0.05, 95% CI 48.7 – 108). Conclusions Patients with a traumatic RCT and GT fractures have different scapular morphology and radiographic features which predisposes them to have these injuries. Patients presenting with a traumatic RCT are more likely to have a higher CSA and have a greater delay to further scan.

When Do Rotator Cuff Repairs Fail? Serial Ultrasound Examination After Arthroscopic Repair of Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 2064-2070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce S. Miller ◽  
Brian K. Downie ◽  
Robert B. Kohen ◽  
Theresa Kijek ◽  
Bryson Lesniak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Ultrasound Examination ◽  
Arthroscopic Repair ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Massive Rotator Cuff Tears
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document