Comparison of a Travoprost BAK-Free Formulation Preserved with Polyquaternium-1 with BAK-Preserved Travoprost in Ocular Hypertension or Open-Angle Glaucoma

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Stefano Gandolfi ◽  
Tania Paredes ◽  
Ivan Goldberg ◽  
Michael Coote ◽  
...  

Purpose To demonstrate that the intraocular pressure (IOP)–lowering effect of travoprost 0.004% preserved with polyquaternium-1 (travoprost benzalkonium chloride [BAK]-free) is non-inferior to that of travoprost 0.004% preserved with benzalkonium chloride (travoprost BAK) in patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma. Methods A total of 371 patients randomly received travoprost BAK-free (n=185) or travoprost BAK (n=186) dosed once daily in the evening for 3 months. Patients were evaluated at 9 AM, 11 AM, and 4 PM at baseline, weeks 2 and 6, and month 3. Intraocular pressure was also evaluated 36 and 60 hours after the month 3 visit. Results Travoprost BAK-free is non-inferior to travoprost BAK. The 95% upper confidence limits for the difference in mean IOP at month 3 (primary efficacy) were 0.5 mmHg, 0.6 mmHg, and 0.5 mmHg, at 9 AM, 11 AM, and 4 PM, respectively. Mean IOP reductions from baseline ranged from 7.6 to 8.7 mmHg in the travoprost BAK-free group and from 7.7 to 9.2 mmHg in the travoprost BAK group. At 36 and 60 hours after the last dose, mean IOP remained 6.8 mmHg and 5.7 mmHg below baseline in the travoprost BAK-free group, vs 7.3 mmHg and 6.0 mmHg in the travoprost BAK group, respectively. The safety profile of travoprost BAK-free was similar to that of travoprost BAK. Conclusions Travoprost BAK-free safely and effectively lowers IOP in eyes with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. This BAK-free formulation has comparable safety, efficacy, and duration of IOP-lowering effect to travoprost preserved with BAK. Travoprost BAK-free is an effective option for IOP reduction while avoiding BAK exposure.

Author(s):  
Anjleen Kaur ◽  
Shikha Palta ◽  
Hema Chhabra ◽  
Gursatinder Singh ◽  
Anita Gupta

Background: To evaluate the change in mean IOP with BKC-preserved latanoprost versus BKC-free latanoprost in patients of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG).Methods: This was an open-label, randomized, interventional, switch trial. Thirty patients of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) who were already on benzalkonium chloride (BKC)-preserved latanoprost for a minimum of three months were recruited. Their intraocular pressure (IOP) was recorded at the baseline. Then, they were switched over to benzalkonium chloride (BKC)-free latanoprost for another three months. Their intraocular pressure (IOP) was recorded at both 6 and 12 weeks of follow-up.Results: IOP decreased from 15.57±0.85mm Hg at baseline to 15.40±0.89mm Hg at 6 weeks to 15.30±0.70mm Hg at 12 weeks. p value was found to be 0.209 and 0.115 at 6 and 12 weeks respectively. No statistically significant change was observed between mean IOP at both 6 and 12 weeks as compared to the baseline.Conclusions: BKC-free medications have equal IOP lowering effect as BKC-preserved medications in glaucoma patients.


1970 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 3-7
Author(s):  
Mario V. Aquino ◽  
Margarita Lat-Luna

The objective of this study was to compare the effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) of latanoprost 0.005% once daily with timolol 0.5% twice daily in patients with open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. The study was designed as a single-centre, randomised, double-masked parallel-group comparison of latanoprost with timolol after 12 weeks of treatment. 60 patients with open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension with IOP of at least 22 mm Hg were included. Administration of previous ocular hypotensive medication necessitated a wash-out period of 5 to 21 days before the start of the study treatment. The patients were randomised to treatment with latanoprost 0.005% once daily or timolol 0.5% twice daily. Mean diurnal IOP was measured at baseline and after 6 and 12 weeks of treatment. After 6 weeks of treatment, the diurnal IOP reduction (mean± standard error of the mean [SEM]) in the latanoprost group was 12.1±1.1 mm Hg (41%;p<0.001; analysis of covariance [ANCOVA]) and 8.7 ± 1.1 mm Hg (30%; p < 0.001; ANCOVA) in the timolol group. The difference of 3.4 ± 1.6 mm Hg was statistically significant in favour of latanoprost (p = 0.034; ANCOVA). A 30% reduction or more in mean diurnal IOP was achieved by 71 % of patients in the latanoprost group and by 34% of patients in the timolol group. After 12 weeks of treatment, the diurnal IOP reduction (mean± SEM) in the latanoprost group was 11.1±1.2 mm Hg (39%; p < 0.001; ANCOVA) and 9.1 ± 1.1 mm Hg (32%; p < 0.001; ANCOVA) in the timolol group. Most side effects observed were mild and transient and no serious adverse events were reported. Latanoprost 0.005% administered once daily in the evening was at least as effective as timolol 0.5% twice daily in reducing the mean diurnal IOP after 6 and 12 weeks of treatment. Both medications were well tolerated during the study period. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document