Graph partitions and integer flows

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xujin Chen
2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 376-391
Author(s):  
Miaomiao Han ◽  
Jiaao Li ◽  
Rong Luo ◽  
Yongtang Shi ◽  
Cun-Quan Zhang
Keyword(s):  

1995 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 1075-1087 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.K. Aggarwal ◽  
M. Oblak ◽  
R.R. Vemuganti

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (02) ◽  
pp. 95-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prosenjit Bose ◽  
André van Renssen

We present improved upper bounds on the spanning ratio of constrained [Formula: see text]-graphs with at least 6 cones and constrained Yao-graphs with 5 or at least 7 cones. Given a set of points in the plane, a Yao-graph partitions the plane around each vertex into [Formula: see text] disjoint cones, each having aperture [Formula: see text], and adds an edge to the closest vertex in each cone. Constrained Yao-graphs have the additional property that no edge properly intersects any of the given line segment constraints. Constrained [Formula: see text]-graphs are similar to constrained Yao-graphs, but use a different method to determine the closest vertex. We present tight bounds on the spanning ratio of a large family of constrained [Formula: see text]-graphs. We show that constrained [Formula: see text]-graphs with [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text] and integer) cones have a tight spanning ratio of [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is [Formula: see text]. We also present improved upper bounds on the spanning ratio of the other families of constrained [Formula: see text]-graphs. These bounds match the current upper bounds in the unconstrained setting. We also show that constrained Yao-graphs with an even number of cones ([Formula: see text]) have spanning ratio at most [Formula: see text] and constrained Yao-graphs with an odd number of cones ([Formula: see text]) have spanning ratio at most [Formula: see text]. As is the case with constrained [Formula: see text]-graphs, these bounds match the current upper bounds in the unconstrained setting, which implies that like in the unconstrained setting using more cones can make the spanning ratio worse.


2012 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Landon Rabern
Keyword(s):  

1983 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 349-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. H. Younger
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (03n04) ◽  
pp. 135-149
Author(s):  
Prosenjit Bose ◽  
Pat Morin ◽  
André van Renssen

We present tight bounds on the spanning ratio of a large family of ordered [Formula: see text]-graphs. A [Formula: see text]-graph partitions the plane around each vertex into [Formula: see text] disjoint cones, each having aperture [Formula: see text]. An ordered [Formula: see text]-graph is constructed by inserting the vertices one by one and connecting each vertex to the closest previously-inserted vertex in each cone. We show that for any integer [Formula: see text], ordered [Formula: see text]-graphs with [Formula: see text] cones have a tight spanning ratio of [Formula: see text]. We also show that for any integer [Formula: see text], ordered [Formula: see text]-graphs with [Formula: see text] cones have a tight spanning ratio of [Formula: see text]. We provide lower bounds for ordered [Formula: see text]-graphs with [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] cones. For ordered [Formula: see text]-graphs with [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] cones these lower bounds are strictly greater than the worst case spanning ratios of their unordered counterparts. These are the first results showing that ordered [Formula: see text]-graphs have worse spanning ratios than unordered [Formula: see text]-graphs. Finally, we show that, unlike their unordered counterparts, the ordered [Formula: see text]-graphs with 4, 5, and 6 cones are not spanners.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document