Tracking Innovation Performance After Joint Ventures Termination: Have Local Firms learned?

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (1) ◽  
pp. 17322
Author(s):  
Can Li ◽  
Mona V Makhija ◽  
Danxue Gao
2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-103
Author(s):  
Mohammad Hussein Bashayreh

AbstractJoint ventures are common in Jordan, especially in the construction sector. Local firms and foreign entrepreneurs use them for different legal and competition considerations. However, joint ventures are not regulated as such, hence their disputable legal characterisation. Jordanian courts treat commercial joint ventures as valid companies with juridical personalities regardless of incorporation formalities. Courts apparently take this as a rule of law. Relevant cases reveal inconsistency and are not wholly consonant with the law. While judicial creativity may be classifying joint ventures as companies sui generis, this article seeks to establish that this is incorrect. The nature of a joint venture should rest on the underlying agreement, which may envisage a general partnership, a silent company, or another scheme. Existing legislations are satisfactory as this article explains. Accordingly, the judicial approach should be abandoned to avoid current uncertainties and to attain predictability of consistent legal solutions.


2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-137
Author(s):  
Murali Patibandla

Emerging economies present the case of rapid changes in markets and institutions. In this context, joint ventures between multinational enterprises (MNEs) and local firms are subject to a gamut of calculations between the partners for arriving at mutually beneficial contractual arrangements. In this note, we analyze two case studies utilizing a combination of the intangible asset theory of MNEs, Williamson’s concepts of asset specificity and holdup, and the resource-based theory of the firm. Both case studies involve financial services, namely, credit cards and insurance products. In these two cases, a large local bank provided the brand name, while the MNEs provided the back-end technical-support, which is a seeming reversal of the normal pattern in emerging markets. From a resource-based theory perspective, at the inception of such joint ventures, investments in relation to specific assets may be small and the possibility of holdup seems remote, but when markets become complex the possibility of holdup increases dramatically. In this kind of context, joint venture partners have to adopt a dynamic perspective and formulate ex ante strategies for addressing the holdup problem, even though static analysis may suggest that there is only limited or no possibility of such holdup. Our analysis brings forth fresh insights on the issue of joint ventures, especially in the context of financial services, in an emerging economy.


2019 ◽  
pp. 484-504
Author(s):  
John Child ◽  
David Faulkner ◽  
Stephen Tallman ◽  
Linda Hsieh

Chapter 22 notes the growing attraction of emerging economies as host locations for foreign direct investment (FDI). While acquisitions are generally the favored mode of FDI into developed-economy markets, cooperative forms allowing for local participation, such as joint ventures, have been more prevalent in emerging economies, often due to the mandatory requirements of host governments. Emerging economies are distinctive environments for MNEs partnering with local firms, and this can give rise to certain challenges. One is a conflict of objectives held by MNEs and their emerging economy alliance partner(s), with the latter prioritizing defensive and developmental needs. Additionally, the number of multinationals from emerging economy firms (EMNEs) has grown substantially, often internationalizing through alliances with developed economy MNEs as well as with firms in other emerging economies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document