The past and the future of vascular access surgery: Creation of percutaneous arteriovenous fistula using Ellipsys vascular access system in a patient with previous ipsilateral Scribner-shunt

Background: Sixty years after the first description of Scribner-shunt, and 54 years after publication of the first radio-cephalic arterio-venous fistula (AVF), endovascular percutaneous AVF (pAVF) was introduced. We report a successful case of Ellipsys-pAVF creation and use for hemodialysis in a patient with a previous ipsilateral Scribner-shunt. Case: A 72-year old female patient with chronic kidney disease (CKD), previous right-sided Scribner-shunt and kidney transplant, underwent a successful creation of right-sided Ellipsys-pAVF. The procedure time was 12 min with intraoperative brachial artery volume flow of 720 ml/min. At 39 days, an ultrasound-guided balloon-angioplasty of the outflow cephalic vein stenosis was performed. Cannulations were started 41 days after the creation of pAVF. No additional interventions were required during the follow-up of 258 days with last follow-up volume flow of 1400 ml/min. Conclusions: This is the first report of the creation of pAVF in a patient with previous “traumatic” ipsilateral placement of a Scribner-shunt. It allows the creation of a small anastomosis in very short time, which can be successfully used for hemodialysis treatment on the same day, if necessary, and reduces the expected risk of high-flow AVF with associated peripheral steal and cardiac outcomes (especially in a patient with cardiomyopathy such this one).

Surgical intervention for upper extremity nerve compression related to arteriovenous hemodialysis accesses

Objective: Chronic renal failure patients with arteriovenous hemodialysis access may exhibit pain and neurological complaints due to local nerve compression by the access conduit vessels of autogenous arteriovenous fistulas or the prosthesis of arteriovenous grafts. In this study, we have examined the results of surgical intervention for vascular access–related nerve compression in the upper extremity. Methods: A single center retrospective study was performed of all patients referred for persistent pain and neurological complaints after vascular access surgery for hemodialysis. There were four brachial-cephalic, three brachial-basilic upper arm arteriovenous fistulas, and three prosthetic arteriovenous grafts. All patients had pain and sensory deficits in a distinct nerve territory (median nerve: 6; median + ulnar nerve: 1; medial cutaneous nerve: 1), and two patients had additional motor deficits (median nerve). Results: A total of 10 patients (mean age: 59 years; range: 25–73 years; 2 men; 4 diabetics) were treated by surgical nerve release alone (2 patients) or in combination with access revision (8 patients). Mean follow-up was 23 months (range: 8–46 months). Direct complete relief of symptoms was achieved in six patients. Three patients had minor complaints, and one patient had a reoperation with good success. Conclusion: Vascular access–related nerve compression is an uncommon cause for pain, sensory and motor deficits after vascular access surgery. Surgical nerve release and access revision have good clinical outcome with relief of symptoms and maintenance of the access site in the majority of patients.