student loan program
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

23
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

3
(FIVE YEARS 0)





2017 ◽  
Vol 220 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco José Callado ◽  
Elena del Rey ◽  
Natalia Utrero


Author(s):  
Timothy C. Bagwell ◽  
Shareka L. Jackson

This chapter examines the laws, policies and practices of the Federally Guaranteed Student Loan Program and the use of digital records and databases in creating changes in the laws governing the collections of student loan debt that have led to Bills of Attainder upon consumers in default on their Federal student loans. The research found a relationship between how information is created and utilized within the student loan program and due process issues related to the offset of income tax refunds. It examines how the databases are used as a means of surveillance how the administrative practice of due diligence was compromised by student loan guarantors, lending institutions and the Department of Education. The practice of reasonable due diligence is the accepted standard for valid administrative record keeping. It is the assertion of this research that the end result has been the creation of a digital Bill of Attainder upon the property (income tax refunds) of consumers in default on their student loans.



2010 ◽  
Vol 85 (11) ◽  
pp. 1676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi Chumley ◽  
Sara Honeck ◽  
Michael Kennedy ◽  
Mark Meyer


2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Andrew Austin

The article analyzes effects of borrower interest rates and student lender subsidies on federally guaranteed student loan volumes from 1988 to 1994 and from 1996 to 2006. Some have argued that lender subsidy cuts would reduce loan supply or cause lenders to exit the student loan market. If lenders get economic rents due to overly generous subsidies, a simple model of the student loan market suggests that small changes in subsidy levels should not affect loan supply. Empirical results based on a variety of generalized method of moments panel estimators suggest that evidence of links between higher special allowance payment margins and higher loan volumes is weak or inconclusive for both the 1988–94 and 1996–2006 periods. Subsidy reductions, according to this analysis, had no discernable effect on student loan volumes. Results also suggest that higher real borrower interest rates reduce student loan volumes for public colleges and universities. Changes in the federal student loan program in the wake of the credit crunch that began in August 2007 are briefly discussed, along with current proposals to shift all new loans to a direct lending program.



JAMA ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 290 (12) ◽  
pp. 1569-c-1569
Author(s):  
B. Vastag


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document