receptive identification
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

10
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Markham ◽  
Aimee Giles ◽  
Richard May

The components of discrete-trial teaching (DTT) may be individualized to each learner during instruction (e.g., the type of prompts used). However, there is limited research on the relative efficiency and effectiveness of these different prompt types. In addition, the learner’s preference for how they are taught is not always considered. The present study compared relative effectiveness of three prompt types (i.e., a gesture, modeling, physical guidance) to a no-prompt control condition during a receptive identification task with three boys with autism. One participant met the mastery criterion first in the model prompt condition, and two participants in the physical prompt condition. All participants selected the physical prompt during a concurrent-chains preference assessment. In addition, all participants completed a chained task using the most effective prompt type.


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-67
Author(s):  
Sabine Saade Chebli ◽  
Marc J. Lanovaz ◽  
Marie-Michèle Dufour

The purpose of our study was to compare the effectiveness of tablet- and instructor-delivered teaching (i.e., prompting and reinforcement) on the receptive identification of one-word concepts in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). To this end, we embedded a multielement design within a multiple probe design to compare the effectiveness of the two instructional modalities in seven participants. Two of the seven participants showed generalization on all concepts in fewer instructional trials following instructor-delivered teaching, whereas the remaining five participants had mixed results depending on the concept. In total, the participants showed more rapid generalization with the instructor for 14 of the 19 concepts taught. Our results suggest that tablets should not systematically replace instructor-delivered prompting and reinforcement, but that they may be used to provide supplementary teaching to children with ASD.


2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 634-646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiley A. Schneider ◽  
Bailey Devine ◽  
Gabriella Aguilar ◽  
Anna Ingeborg Petursdottir

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 178-187
Author(s):  
Jennifer Ninci ◽  
Mandy Rispoli ◽  
Leslie C Neely ◽  
Samantha Guz

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiffany Kodak ◽  
Tom Cariveau ◽  
Brittany A. LeBlanc ◽  
Jacob J. Mahon ◽  
Regina A. Carroll

The present investigation examined special education teachers’ selection and use of teaching strategies for receptive identification training with children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in their classrooms. Teachers first responded to a survey in which they provided examples of receptive identification tasks taught in their classrooms, rated the efficacy of teaching strategies, described how they determined whether skills were mastered, listed any assessments they conducted to identify relevant prerequisite skills prior to receptive identification training, described how they selected teaching strategies for use in their classrooms, and listed their years of experience as a teacher and working with children with ASD. Subsequent observations of implementation of teaching strategies during trial-based instruction occurred in a proportion of teachers’ classrooms. The results of the observations showed that participants did not consistently implement components of trial-based instruction as described in the literature, and there were differences in implementation depending on the types of skills targeted during instruction.


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 349-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin B. Leaf ◽  
Joseph H. Cihon ◽  
Donna Townley-Cochran ◽  
Kevin Miller ◽  
Ronald Leaf ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer B. Ganz ◽  
Ee Rea Hong ◽  
Fara Goodwyn ◽  
Elizabeth Kite ◽  
Whitney Gilliland

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document