spectral estimators
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

101
(FIVE YEARS 8)

H-INDEX

16
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Marco Mondelli ◽  
Christos Thrampoulidis ◽  
Ramji Venkataramanan

AbstractWe study the problem of recovering an unknown signal $${\varvec{x}}$$ x given measurements obtained from a generalized linear model with a Gaussian sensing matrix. Two popular solutions are based on a linear estimator $$\hat{\varvec{x}}^\mathrm{L}$$ x ^ L and a spectral estimator $$\hat{\varvec{x}}^\mathrm{s}$$ x ^ s . The former is a data-dependent linear combination of the columns of the measurement matrix, and its analysis is quite simple. The latter is the principal eigenvector of a data-dependent matrix, and a recent line of work has studied its performance. In this paper, we show how to optimally combine $$\hat{\varvec{x}}^\mathrm{L}$$ x ^ L and $$\hat{\varvec{x}}^\mathrm{s}$$ x ^ s . At the heart of our analysis is the exact characterization of the empirical joint distribution of $$({\varvec{x}}, \hat{\varvec{x}}^\mathrm{L}, \hat{\varvec{x}}^\mathrm{s})$$ ( x , x ^ L , x ^ s ) in the high-dimensional limit. This allows us to compute the Bayes-optimal combination of $$\hat{\varvec{x}}^\mathrm{L}$$ x ^ L and $$\hat{\varvec{x}}^\mathrm{s}$$ x ^ s , given the limiting distribution of the signal $${\varvec{x}}$$ x . When the distribution of the signal is Gaussian, then the Bayes-optimal combination has the form $$\theta \hat{\varvec{x}}^\mathrm{L}+\hat{\varvec{x}}^\mathrm{s}$$ θ x ^ L + x ^ s and we derive the optimal combination coefficient. In order to establish the limiting distribution of $$({\varvec{x}}, \hat{\varvec{x}}^\mathrm{L}, \hat{\varvec{x}}^\mathrm{s})$$ ( x , x ^ L , x ^ s ) , we design and analyze an approximate message passing algorithm whose iterates give $$\hat{\varvec{x}}^\mathrm{L}$$ x ^ L and approach $$\hat{\varvec{x}}^\mathrm{s}$$ x ^ s . Numerical simulations demonstrate the improvement of the proposed combination with respect to the two methods considered separately.


Author(s):  
Valdério Anselmo Reisen ◽  
Céline Lévy-Leduc ◽  
Higor Henrique Aranda Cotta ◽  
Pascal Bondon ◽  
Marton Ispany ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (27) ◽  
pp. 275203 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W Barrett ◽  
Paul Druce ◽  
Lisa Glaser
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasile V. Moca ◽  
Adriana Nagy-Dăbâcan ◽  
Harald Bârzan ◽  
Raul C. Mureşan

AbstractTime-frequency analysis is ubiquitous in many fields of science. Due to the Heisenberg-Gabor uncertainty principle, a single measurement cannot estimate precisely the location of a finite oscillation in both time and frequency. Classical spectral estimators, like the short-time Fourier transform (STFT) or the continuous-wavelet transform (CWT) optimize either temporal or frequency resolution, or find a tradeoff that is suboptimal in both dimensions. Following concepts from optical super-resolution, we introduce a new spectral estimator enabling time-frequency super-resolution. Sets of wavelets with increasing bandwidth are combined geometrically in a superlet to maintain the good temporal resolution of wavelets and gain frequency resolution in the upper bands. Superlets outperform the STFT, CWT, and other super-resolution methods on synthetic data and brain signals recorded in humans and rodents, resolving time-frequency details with unprecedented precision. Importantly, superlets can reveal transient oscillation events that are hidden in the averaged time-frequency spectrum by other methods.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 3703-3737 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Gerard ◽  
Peter Hoff

2016 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 672-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Sandoval-Ibarra ◽  
V. H. Diaz-Ramirez ◽  
V. I. Kober ◽  
V. N. Karnaukhov

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document