Tibial Slope and Its Effect on Graft Force in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions

Background: A flattened posterior tibial slope may cause excessive unwanted stress on the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction graft and place patients at risk for PCL reconstruction graft failure. To date, there is a paucity of biomechanical studies evaluating the effect of posterior tibial slope on the loading properties of single-bundle (SB) and double-bundle (DB) PCL grafts. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of sagittal plane tibial slope on PCL reconstruction graft force at varying slopes and knee flexion angles for SB and DB PCL reconstructions. The null hypothesis was that there would be no differences in SB or DB PCL graft forces with changes in posterior tibial slope or knee flexion angle. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten male fresh-frozen cadaveric knees had a proximal posterior tibial osteotomy performed and an external fixator placed for tibial slope adjustment. SB (anterolateral bundle [ALB] only) and DB PCL reconstruction procedures were performed and tested consecutively for each specimen. The ALB and posteromedial bundle graft forces were recorded before (unloaded force) and after (loaded force) compression with a 300-N axial load. Unloaded and loaded graft forces were tested at flexion angles of 45°, 60°, 75°, and 90°. Tibial slope was varied between −2° and 16° of posterior slope at 2° increments under these test conditions. Results: Modeling for unloaded testing revealed that tibial slope had an independently significant and linear decreasing effect on the force of all PCL grafts regardless of flexion angle (coefficient = −1.0, SE = 0.08, P < .001). Higher knee flexion angles were significantly associated with higher unloaded graft force for all PCL grafts ( P < .001). After the graft was subjected to loading, tibial slope also had an independently significant and linear decreasing effect on the loaded force of all PCL grafts regardless of flexion angle (coefficient = −0.70, SE = 0.11, P < .001). The ALB graft of DB reconstructions had a significantly lower loaded graft force than the ALB graft of the SB PCL reconstruction (coefficient = 14.8, SE = 1.62, P < .001). The posteromedial bundle graft had a significantly lower loaded graft force than the ALB graft in both reconstruction states across all flexion angles (both P < .001). Higher knee flexion angles were also significantly associated with higher loaded graft force for all graft constructs ( P < .001). Conclusion: PCL graft forces increased as tibial slope decreased (flattened) in the loaded and unloaded states. An increased posterior tibial slope was protective of PCL reconstruction grafts. The findings of this study support the effect of tibial slope on PCL grafts that has been noted clinically, and a flat tibial slope should be considered a factor when evaluating the cause of failed PCL reconstructions. Clinical Relevance: The authors validated that decreased tibial slope increased the loads on PCL reconstruction grafts. Patients with flat tibial slopes in chronic tears or revision PCL reconstruction cases should be evaluated closely for the possible need of a first-stage or concurrent slope-increasing tibial osteotomy.

Function of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Bundles during in Vivo Knee Flexion

Background The biomechanical functions of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament over the range of flexion of the knee joint remain unclear. Hypothesis The posterior cruciate ligament bundles have minimal length at low flexion angles and maximal length at high flexion angles. Study Design Descriptive laboratory study. Methods Seven knees from normal, healthy subjects were scanned with magnetic resonance, and 3-dimensional models of the femur, tibia, and posterior cruciate ligament attachment sites were created. The lines connecting the centroids of the corresponding bundle attachment sites on the femur and tibia represented the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament. Each knee was imaged during weightbearing flexion (from 0° to maximal flexion) using a dual-orthogonal fluoroscopic system. The length, elevation, deviation, and twist of the posterior cruciate ligament bundles were measured as a function of flexion. Results The lengths of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles increased with flexion from 0° to 120° and decreased beyond 120° of flexion. The posteromedial bundle had a lower elevation angle than the anterolateral bundle beyond 60° of flexion. The anterolateral bundle had a larger deviation angle than the posteromedial bundle beyond 75° of flexion. The femoral attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament twisted externally with increasing flexion and reached a maximum of 86.4° ± 14.7° at 135° of flexion (P < .05). Conclusion These data suggest that there is no reciprocal function of the bundles with flexion, which is contrary to previous findings. The orientation of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles suggests that at high flexion, the anterolateral bundle might play an important role in constraining the mediolateral translation, whereas the posteromedial bundle might play an important role in constraining the anteroposterior translation of the tibia. Clinical Relevance These data provide a better understanding of the biomechanical function of the posterior cruciate ligament bundles and may help to improve the design of the 2-bundle reconstruction techniques of the ruptured posterior cruciate ligament.

Codominance of the Individual Posterior Cruciate Ligament Bundles: An Analysis of Bundle Lengths and Orientation

Background: It is unclear how each bundle of the posterior cruciate ligament contributes to posterior knee stability. Hypothesis: Changes in bundle orientation and length occur such that neither bundle dominates in restraining posterior tibial motion throughout knee flexion and extension. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Six fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were studied in a joint-testing rig with individual quadriceps and hamstring muscle loading. Kinematic data for the tibia and femur were obtained at knee flexion angles from 0° to 120°. The joint was then disarticulated, and the insertions of the two bundles on the tibia and femur were digitized. Results: Length of the anterolateral bundle increased with increasing knee flexion angle from 10° to 120°. Length of the posteromedial bundle decreased with increasing knee flexion angle from 0° to 45° and increased slightly from 60° to 120°. Length of the anteromedial bundle was significantly less than that of the posteromedial at 0°, 10°, and 20° of knee flexion. The anterolateral bundle was significantly more horizontal at flexion angles of 0°, 10°, 20°, 30°, and 45° (P < 0.05). The posteromedial bundle was more horizontal at 120°. Conclusions: Changes in orientation take place such that neither bundle dominates in restraining posterior tibial motion throughout knee flexion and extension. Clinical Relevance: Double-bundle reconstructions achieve more physiologic knee function.