laser suture lysis
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

48
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

14
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
pp. 112067212090169
Author(s):  
Sofia Sousa Mano ◽  
Raquel Marques Esteves ◽  
Nuno Pinto Ferreira ◽  
Luís Abegão Pinto

Aim: To analyse the efficacy and safety of a standardized laser suture lysis protocol following trabeculectomy. Materials and methods: Prospective interventional study conducted at a tertiary centre, between June 2016 and July 2017. Consecutive patients undergoing primary trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (0.4 mg/mL) for open angle glaucoma were enrolled. According to study protocol, a first laser suture lysis was performed routinely when intraocular pressure was greater than 10 mmHg, starting at postoperative day 8, and a second laser suture lysis was done whenever the intraocular pressure was newly greater than 10 mmHg, with a minimum interval of 1 week after the first laser suture lysis. Primary outcome was intraocular pressure (mean value, and mean difference from baseline in percentage). Safety parameters were also analysed. Results: Thirty-three eyes of 28 patients (13 males) were enrolled with a mean age of 69.6 ± 15.1 years. Pre-operative intraocular pressure was 24.9 ± 8.6 mmHg. All eyes underwent a laser suture lysis before the 12th postoperative week, with a mean intraocular pressure–lowering efficacy of 42.4% (p < 0.01). A second laser suture lysis procedure, when performed (n = 14), had an additional intraocular pressure–lowering efficacy of 26.7% (p = 0.02). Mean intraocular pressure at 1-month follow-up was 12.9 ± 8.2 mmHg, and during this period, two cases of self-limited choroidal detachments were noticed. Ten patients needed additional bleb needling. Mean intraocular pressure at 1-year follow-up was 13.8 ± 8.0 mmHg under an average of 0.4 topical intraocular pressure–lowering drugs (p < 0.01). Conclusion: In our study, laser suture lysis was an effective tool to lower intraocular pressure during the early postoperative period, with an acceptable safety profile.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 225
Author(s):  
Caglar OKTEM ◽  
Umit EKSIOGLU ◽  
Ahmet KADERLI ◽  
Mehmet YAKIN ◽  
Gulizar DEMIROK ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. e163-e164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Assaf Kratz ◽  
Ivan Goldberg ◽  
Jaime Levy ◽  
Boris Knyazer ◽  
Tova Lifshitz

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Swati Ramakrishna ◽  
Sirish Nelivigi ◽  
AshaMaganahalli Sadananda ◽  
Sri Ganesh

Eye ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 1220-1225 ◽  
Author(s):  
H-k Cho ◽  
S Kojima ◽  
T Inoue ◽  
A Fukushima ◽  
C Kee ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. e84-e87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Krömer ◽  
Bernhard Nölle ◽  
Florian Rüfer

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 313-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chelvin C.A. Sng ◽  
Mandeep Singh ◽  
Paul Tec Kuan Chew ◽  
Cheryl S. Ngo ◽  
Ce Zheng ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document