torsionfree module
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

2
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

1
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (03) ◽  
pp. 467-478
Author(s):  
Guoqiang Zhao ◽  
Bo Zhang

As the dual of the Auslander transpose and the resulting k-torsionfree module, the cotranspose and k-cotorsionfree module with respect to a semidualizing bimodule have been introduced recently. In this paper we first investigate the relation between relative k-cotorsionfree modules and relative k-cosyzygy modules. Then we study the extension closure of these two classes of modules.


1997 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 1429-1447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Toffalori

Let G be a finite group. A Z [G]-lattice is a finitely generated Z-torsionfree module over the group ring Z [G]. There is a general conjecture concerning classes of modules over sufficiently recursive rings, and linking wildness and undecidability. Given a finite group G, Z [G] is sufficiently recursive, and our aim here is just to investigate this conjecture for Z [G]-lattices. In this setting, the conjecture says thatif and only ifIn particular, we wish to deal here with the direction from the left to the right, so the one assuring that wildness implies undecidability. Of course, before beginning the analysis of this problem, one should agree upon a sharp definition of wildness for lattices. But, for our purposes, one might alternatively accept as a starting point a general classification of wild Z [G]-lattices when G is a finite p-group for some prime p, based on the isomorphism type of G. This is due to several authors and can be found, for instance, in [3]. It says that, when p is a prime and G is a finite p-group, thenif and only if.More precisely, the representation type of Z [G]-lattices is finite when G is cyclic of order ≤ p2, tame domestic when G is the Klein group [1], tame non-domestic when G is cyclic of order 8 [11].So our claim might be stated as follows.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document