Redesigning care to lower episode costs in bone marrow transplantation.

16 Background: Increased scrutiny over costs of cancer care has led to the introduction of episode-based payment by federal and commercial insurers. National average billed charges for autologous and allogeneic transplant episodes of care are approximately $375K and $925K, respectively. Through comprehensive analysis of claims data, we identified leading drivers of cost in BMT episodes (which span 30 days before transplant through 60-100 days post-transplant) and cost reduction opportunities. By redesigning care delivery, we can reduce post-transplant admissions and potentially improve the health and patient experience for this population. Methods: From September 1, 2013 – February 28, 2015, SHC performed 221 allogeneic and 241 autologous transplants. We analyzed internal claims data to map costs of BMT episodes, including pre-transplant, transplant (index), and post-transplant phases of care using standardized cost categories including room accommodations, medications, medical and surgical supplies, imaging, and labs. Results: 67% of episode cost was associated with pre-transplant and index phases. In both phases, patients’ treatment closely matched defined protocols. Imaging, medications, and blood utilization met clinical indications. The largest opportunity was seen in the post-transplant phase for patients with multiple myeloma who received autologous transplants. On average, episodes with post-transplant admissions were 35% more costly than episodes without post-transplant admissions. Many of these patients are admitted 5-9 days after transplant due to neutropenic fever, have short LOS, and receive empiric antibiotics. An estimated 37% of post-transplant admissions, totaling $790,000 in annualized cost, may be prevented with additional outpatient support. Conclusions: A multidisciplinary team proposed redesigning care to safely shift treatment from the inpatient to outpatient setting. Strategies include expanding Infusion Treatment Area and home pharmacy capacity and partnering with home health agencies.

Can Oral Nutritional Supplements Improve Medicare Patient Outcomes in the Hospital?

We analyzed the effect of oral nutritional supplement (ONS) use on 30-day readmission rates, length of stay (LOS), and episode costs in hospitalized Medicare patients (≥65), and subsets of patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), congestive heart failure (CHF) or pneumonia (PNA). Propensity-score matching and instrumental variables were used to analyze ONS and non-ONS episodes from the Premier Research Database (2000–2010). ONS use was associated with reductions in probability of 30-day readmission by 12.0% in AMI and 10.1% in CHF. LOS decreases of 10.9% in AMI, 14.2% in CHF, and 8.5% in PNA were associated with ONS, as were decreases in episode costs in AMI, CHF and PNA of 5.1%, 7.8% and 10.6%, respectively. The effect on LOS and episode cost was greatest for the Any Diagnosis population, with decreases of 16.0% and 15.8%, respectively. ONS use in hospitalized Medicare patients ≥65 is associated with improved outcomes and decreased healthcare costs, and is therefore relevant to providers seeking an inexpensive, evidence-based approach for meeting Affordable Care Act quality targets.