tactile spatial resolution
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

12
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yannick Bleyenheuft ◽  
Pauline Wilmotte ◽  
Jean-Louis Thonnard

2007 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 111-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yannick Bleyenheuft ◽  
Jean-Louis Thonnard

2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 83-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yannick Bleyenheuft ◽  
Caroline Cols ◽  
Carlyne Arnould ◽  
Jean-Louis Thonnard

Neurology ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 55 (10) ◽  
pp. 1597-1597 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Ponsford ◽  
R. W. Van Boven

2000 ◽  
Vol 130 (4) ◽  
pp. 542 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.W. Van Boven ◽  
R.H. Hamilton ◽  
T. Kauffman ◽  
J.P. Keenan ◽  
A. Pascual-Leone

Neurology ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 54 (12) ◽  
pp. 2230-2236 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. W. V. Boven ◽  
R. H. Hamilton ◽  
T. Kauffman ◽  
J. P. Keenan ◽  
A. Pascual-Leone

2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
James C. Craig ◽  
Kenneth O. Johnson

The two-point threshold, or compass test, has long been used as a measure of tactile spatial resolution; however, since it was first developed, there have been problems associated with its use. Some of these problems include setting an appropriate criterion for responding “two,” extreme variability both within and between subjects, and the ability of subjects to discriminate two points from one at separations well below the two-point threshold. Recent neurophysiological results have clarified some of the neural mechanisms responsible for spatial resolution and demonstrated the inadequacy of the two-point threshold as a measure of spatial mechanisms. Several new methods may overcome these problems and provide a valid measure of spatial resolution and a reflection of neural mechanisms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document