A Comparative Study of Feature-Salience Ranking Techniques

We assess the relative merits of a number of techniques designed to determine the relative salience of the elements of a feature set with respect to their ability to predict a category outcome-for example, which features of a character contribute most to accurate character recognition. A number of different neural-net-based techniques have been proposed (by us and others) in addition to a standard statistical technique, and we add a technique based on inductively generated decision trees. The salience of the features that compose a proposed set is an important problem to solve efficiently and effectively, not only for neural computing technology but also in order to provide a sound basis for any attempt to design an optimal computational system. The focus of this study is the efficiency and the effectiveness with which high-salience subsets of features can be identified in the context of ill-understood and potentially noisy real-world data. Our two simple approaches, weight clamping using a neural network and feature ranking using a decision tree, generally provide a good, consistent ordering of features. In addition, linear correlation often works well.

Some Series Of Partially Balanced Incomplete Block Designs

1. Introduction. The use of incomplete block designs for estimating and judging the significance of the difference of treatment effects is now a standard statistical technique. A special kind of incomplete block design is the Partially Balanced Incomplete Block Design (PBIBD) introduced in (3).