pareto optimal point
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

4
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

1
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 176-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fangwei Ye ◽  
Shiqiu Liu ◽  
Kenneth W. Shum ◽  
Raymond W. Yeung

Author(s):  
Seung-Hyeon Jin ◽  
Nam-Hoon Jeong ◽  
Jae-Ho Choi ◽  
Seong-Hyeon Lee ◽  
Cheol-Ho Kim ◽  
...  

1986 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 448-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis Sullivan ◽  
Harris Schlesinger

This article analyzes the relationships among three canons of “just” taxation: Pareto optimality, individual rationality, and fairness (nonenvy). Using a helpful device called a Kolm triangle, the analysis shows that the fair and Pareto optimal point need not be individually rational, that it will involve progressive taxation, and that it bears no particular relationship to Lindahl equilibrium, but a rather close relationship to Rawlsian justice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document