The Effects of Lower Lateral Cartilage Excision on Nasal Tip Projection

1991 ◽  
Vol 117 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. S. Rich ◽  
W. H. Friedman ◽  
S. J. Pearlman
1985 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank M. Kamer ◽  
Alfred Cohen

One of the most difficult problems encountered in rhinoplasty is lack of nasal tip projection. An innovative technique is described that utilizes the removal of a median horizontal strip of lower lateral cartilage to enhance projection, while maintaining a natural highlight and tip support without the use of grafts. The indications are limited to noses that have a widened dome requiring removal of a central strip, and tip rotation. Alternate techniques are discussed; cases and results are discussed.


1994 ◽  
Vol 111 (3P1) ◽  
pp. 219-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A. Adamson ◽  
Todd A. Morrow

It is generally agreed that rhinoplasty is the most challenging procedure performed by the facial plastic surgeon. Mastery of nasal tip maneuvers to alter tip projection, rotation, and lobule refinement is intrinsic to successful rhinoplasty technique. The nasal hinge region comprises the most lateral aspect of the lower lateral cartilage. Its importance is often overlooked. As the foundation of the nasal base, It plays a key role in tip dynamics and can be sculpted to significantly modify projection, rotation, and lobule refinement. One hundred randomly selected rhinoplasty patients were studied with respect to the indications for hinge maneuvers, techniques applied, and resulting affect on tip aesthetics. Clinical results are shown. The applicability of these hinge techniques is compared with other lateral crural techniques. The importance of the hinge region in rhinoplasty dynamics and the necessity of knowledgeably applying surgical maneuvers in this region are discussed.


1994 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-202
Author(s):  
Andrew P. Ordon

Our approach to decrease tip projection is presented. These techniques may be applied to the three degrees of overprojection, namely the relative, moderate, and ultraprojecting tip. We feel that our techniques will apply to all clinical situations where decrease in projection is desirable. Our concepts have emerged from review of previous techniques and have evolved over our past 1000 rhinoplasties. Excess nasal septum including the nasal spine area, redundancy in the feet of the medial crura, and soft tissue excess may all contribute to the overprojecting tip. However it is excess in the lower lateral cartilage complex, specifically in the medial crus, that requires the most surgical attention and alteration. Our technique in reducing the medial crus to decrease projection is patterned after the Universal Tip Technique described by Parkes and Kanodia. This endonasal technique utilizes a laterally based unipedicled lower lateral cartilage flap, which is freely rotational, but does not violate the continuity of the vestibular skin. With development of our laterally based unipedicle lower lateral cartilage flap, the number of millimeters desired to reduce the projection is removed from the medial crus and eliminated in the final adjustment of tip projection and, in this way, decreases tip projection. In the moderate case, approximately 3 mm of medial crus is excised. In the more severe or ultraprojecting tip, ≥5 is removed from the medial crus. In extreme overprojecting noses, excess soft tissue is addressed by excision of an ellipse of mucosa at the intercartilaginous incision at the septal angle. In the ultraprojecting tip, in addition to resection of redundant cephalic lower lateral cartilage and a ≥5-mm segment of medial crus, it may be necessary to also resect the lateralmost extension of the lower lateral cartilage, the feet of the medial crura, and alar bases. Septal modification, including an inferior strip resection of septum including the nasal spine, may also contribute to decreasing projection. We have found this technique to be effective and predictable over the last 10 years.


1999 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 312-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Parker Porter ◽  
M. Eugene Tardy ◽  
Jacqueline Cheng

2020 ◽  
Vol 277 (5) ◽  
pp. 1371-1377 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Bucher ◽  
S. Kunz ◽  
M. Deggeller ◽  
D. Holzmann ◽  
M. B. Soyka

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 560-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thuy-Van T Ho ◽  
Eric W Cerrati ◽  
Nimit D Gandhi ◽  
Arjun Kalbag ◽  
Steven H Dayan

Abstract Background This is the first study to evaluate the effect of premaxillary filler injection on nasal tip projection, upper lip projection, and upper lip vermilion height. Objectives The primary objective of this study was to analyze the change in nasal tip projection (measured by the Goode ratio) and the change in upper lip projection (measured by the Z angle) following premaxillary hyaluronic acid injection. A secondary objective was to measure the change in upper lip vermilion height. We hypothesized that treated subjects will show an increase in nasal tip projection, upper lip projection, and upper lip vermilion height. Methods Twenty volunteer patients with signs of perioral aging or poor upper lip projection were enrolled in this prospective cohort study and underwent premaxillary hyaluronic acid filler injection between November 2017 and June 2018. Nasal tip projection, upper lip projection, and upper lip vermilion height were assessed from baseline and posttreatment photographs based on the Goode ratio, Z angle, and lip vermilion height ratio, respectively. Results No significant change was noted between pre- and posttreatment Goode ratio measurements (P = 0.841). There was a significant decrease in Z angle and therefore significant increase in upper lip projection with treatment (P < 0.001). The lip vermilion height ratio demonstrated a trend of increased upper lip vermilion height but this did not achieve statistical significance (P = 0.561). Conclusions Premaxillary filler treatment resulted in a significant increase in upper lip projection. Premaxillary filler injection when performed in a safe manner is a valuable treatment option for perioral rejuvenation. Level of Evidence: 4


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document