The American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care

JAMA ◽  
1969 ◽  
Vol 207 (9) ◽  
pp. 1707
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justinn Barr ◽  
Jamie Verheyden ◽  
Xin Sun

This protocol is for Clear, Unobstructed Brain/Body Imaging Cocktails and Computational analysis (CUBIC) of mouse lung tissue for whole lobe imaging using Zeiss Lightsheet Imaging. All experimental procedures were performed in the American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC)-certified laboratory animal facility at the University of California San Diego, following protocols approved by the institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC). The procedures should incorporate all local requirements for standards of animal experimentation.


2021 ◽  
pp. 002367722110192
Author(s):  
Lazara Martínez-Muñoz

The absence, in many nations, of appropriate and corresponding legislation for the protection of experimental animals as well as continual management education programs, significantly affects the inclusion and recognition of experimental results, worldwide. For more than a decade, researchers from Latin American countries have unsuccessfully struggled to get proper legislation. Until today, not many effective results have been seen. After reviewing previous literature and carefully analyzing the available methodologies and practical examples, this paper aims at redesigning the actions and strategies of the members of the research facilities to implement an effective laboratory animal care and use program, and permit the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International (AAALAC) accreditation, independent of national legislative network .This paper also suggests a domestic working method for the teamwork to assume international harmonized legislation, through the application of the Five Disciplines stated by Senge, as methodological process linked with laboratory animal science as scientific background.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
April M. Clayton ◽  
James Hayes ◽  
George W. Lathrop ◽  
Nathaniel Powell

Introduction: Laboratory animal facilities aim to provide excellence in animal care and welfare and support scientific research. Critical to these goals is to ensure a safe work environment for personnel comprising veterinary and animal care, laboratory research, and maintenance staff. Objective: Thus, performing occupational risk assessments allows for evaluation of risks from identified hazards associated with a variety of tasks ongoing in laboratory animal facilities. Methods: Herein, we present the development of an occupational risk assessment tool purposed to capture the dynamics of work performed in laboratory animal facilities, calculate and prioritize identified risks associated with procedures and processes, and inform and evaluate risk mitigations. Results: We also discuss a risk assessment for refining sharps use in nonhuman primate husbandry and care to demonstrate the utility of this tool to improve occupational safety in our animal facility. Conclusion: This tool and framework evolve into a holistic occupational risk management system that identifies, evaluates, and mitigates occupational risks; determines risk acceptability; consistently ensures communication and consultation with frontline personnel, stakeholders, senior leadership, and subject matter experts in biosafety, science, and animal care and welfare; and continuously strives to improve and enhance the operations of laboratory animal facilities.


The Lancet ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 325 (8433) ◽  
pp. 880
Author(s):  
Philip Churchward

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document