scholarly journals Endovascular versus open repair of asymptomatic popliteal artery aneurysm

Author(s):  
Dhiraj Joshi ◽  
Yuri Gupta ◽  
Bhaskar Ganai ◽  
Chloe Mortensen
2018 ◽  
Vol 107 (3) ◽  
pp. 236-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Dorigo ◽  
A. Fargion ◽  
F. Masciello ◽  
G. Piffaretti ◽  
G. Pratesi ◽  
...  

Objective: To compare early and late results of open and endovascular management of popliteal artery aneurysm in a retrospective single-center matched case-control study Methods: From 1981 to 2015, 309 consecutive interventions for popliteal artery aneurysm were performed in our institution, in 59 cases with endovascular repair and in 250 cases with open repair. Endovascular repair was preferred in older asymptomatic patients, while open repair was offered more frequently to patients with a thrombosed popliteal artery aneurysm and a poor run-off status. A one-to-one coarsened exact matching on the basis of the baseline demographic, clinical, and anatomical covariates significantly different between the two treatment options was performed and two equivalent groups of 56 endovascular repairs and open repairs were generated. The two groups were compared in terms of perioperative results with χ2 test and of follow-up outcomes with the Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank test. Results: There were no differences between the two groups in terms of perioperative outcomes. Median duration of follow-up was 38 months. Five-year survival rates were 94% in endovascular repair group and 89.5% in open repair group (p = 0.4, log-rank 0.6). Primary patency rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 81%, 78%, and 72% in endovascular repair group and 82.5%, 80%, and 64% in open repair group (p = 0.8, log-rank 0.01). Freedom from reintervention at 5 years was 65.5% in endovascular repair group and 76% in open repair group (p = 0.2, log-rank 1.2). Secondary patency at 1, 3, and 5 years was 94%, 86%, and 74% in endovascular repair group, and 94%, 89%, and 71% in open repair group, respectively (p = 0.9, log-rank 0.01). The rates of limb preservation at 5 years were 94% in endovascular repair group and 86.4% in open repair group (p = 0.3, log-rank 0.8). Conclusion: Open repair and endovascular repair of popliteal artery aneurysms provided in this retrospective single-center experience similar perioperative and follow-up results in equivalent groups of patients.


Cor et Vasa ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 515-518
Author(s):  
Robert Novotný ◽  
Štěpán Malý ◽  
Květoslav Lipar ◽  
Jaroslav Chlupáč ◽  
Libor Janoušek ◽  
...  

Vascular ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 210-212
Author(s):  
Dipankar Mukherjee ◽  
Tony Tallant

With the advent of endovascular repair of aneurysmal disease, length of hospital stay is becoming shorter. Inherent morbidity and problems associated with open repair have been minimized, leading to an improved patient experience. We describe a fairly typical patient with a popliteal artery aneurysm who would be expected to have a protracted recovery from open resection but instead underwent endovascular repair as an outpatient.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document