Positive pressure therapy for Ménière’s disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie E Webster ◽  
Natasha A Harrington-Benton ◽  
Owen Judd ◽  
Diego Kaski ◽  
Otto R Maarsingh ◽  
...  
Medwave ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (03) ◽  
pp. e7609-e7609
Author(s):  
Jorge Holmberg ◽  
Martín de Amesti ◽  
Andrés Rosenbaum ◽  
Matías Winter

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Munehisa Fukushima ◽  
Shiro Akahani ◽  
Hidenori Inohara ◽  
Noriaki Takeda

Positive pressure therapy (PPT) is applied for medically-intractable vertigo in Ménière's disease (MD); however, it remains unknown whether PPT affects in vivo endolymphatic hydrops (EH). In this case report, we describe a 5-year course of MD in a patient in which EH was repeatedly observed. As the patient experienced recurrent vertigo attacks after endolymphatic sac surgery, he began to use the PPT device additionally and vertiginous episodes decreased in accordance with a decrease in the EH volume. The mechanism of PPT is suggested that the pressure increase in the middle ear inhibits EH development. PPT, if added after surgery, might be more effective to reduce EH volume compared with surgery alone. A larger study group size is required to test these preliminary data concerning EH changes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 276 (5) ◽  
pp. 1263-1273
Author(s):  
Louise Devantier ◽  
Frank Liviu-Adelin Guldfred ◽  
Bjarki Ditlev Djurhuus ◽  
Mina Nicole Händel ◽  
Jesper Hvass Schmidt ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjebm-2020-111410
Author(s):  
Babette Fiebke van Esch ◽  
Hester van der Zaag-Loonen ◽  
Tjasse Bruintjes ◽  
Ton Kuijpers ◽  
Peter Paul G van Benthem

ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of interventions for Menière’s disease (MD) to report clinical implications of the results and to identify areas for future valuable research.MethodsIn line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Abstracts (PRISMA-A) guideline, a systematic online database search was conducted in which MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Ovid) and CENTRAL (Cochrane Library) were searched until May 2021 in order to search for the efficacy of treatment was analysed in a systematic review. Systematic reviews (SRs) on treatments for MD were screened for eligible interventions. From these SRs, we included placebo randomised controlled trials (RCTs). A separate search was conducted to identify RCTs on treatment modalities that were systematically reviewed yet published after the conduction of these SRs. The primary outcome was control of vertigo as defined by the American guideline as published in 1995. The PRISMA-A and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to appraise and evaluate the certainty of evidence.ResultsWe found five SRs from which 19 RCTs were extracted. Five RCTs were added by the separate search resulting in a total of 25 RCTs (n=1248) which evaluated the efficacy of betahistine dihydrochloride, intratympanic injections with gentamicin or steroids, endolymphatic sac surgery and pressure pulse therapy. Evidence on the efficacy of interventions for patients with MD is generally of low certainty. Betahistine (48 mg per day and 144 mg per day) and positive pressure therapy probably do not reduce MD symptoms when compared with placebo. Intratympanic injection with gentamicin or steroids, or treatment with endolymphatic surgery may reduce symptoms in MD when compared with placebo.ConclusionsA definite effective and well-tolerated therapy for MD has yet to be discovered and information on the natural course of disease is one of the biggest flaws in current research.PROSPERO registration numberCRD4201502424.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document