2005 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliet D. French ◽  
Jasmyn Dunn ◽  
Chanel E. Smart ◽  
Nathan Manning ◽  
Melissa A. Brown

2007 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 522-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ceyda Acilan ◽  
Douglas M. Potter ◽  
William S. Saunders

2016 ◽  
Vol 129 (16) ◽  
pp. 3167-3177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Gemble ◽  
Géraldine Buhagiar-Labarchède ◽  
Rosine Onclercq-Delic ◽  
Denis Biard ◽  
Sarah Lambert ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 691-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Biebricher ◽  
Seiki Hirano ◽  
Jacqueline H. Enzlin ◽  
Nicola Wiechens ◽  
Werner W. Streicher ◽  
...  

1979 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. P. Hugenholtz ◽  
W. R. Bruce

Sperm abnormalities were scored in In(5)9Rk homozygotes, heterozygotes and in the inbred strains, C57BL/6J, C3H/HeJ, DBA/2J and JUFaCt, used to produce the heterozygotes. The sperm abnormalities of the inversion heterozygotes were remarkable, about 40% were either double-headed or abnormally large in size. The double-headed sperm had head dimensions similar to those of normal-sized sperm, but the large sperm heads were 1.2 times longer and 1.3 times wider and presumably had twice the usual nuclear volume. This observation suggests that the anaphase bridge formed in inversion heterozygotes resulting from the paracentric inversion may constitute an impediment to cytokinesis and may lead to two genomes being packaged into a single sperm. If this is a general phenomenon, sperm morphology may provide a useful screen for paracentric inversions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document