Parent‐implemented multiple schedules

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 524-541
Author(s):  
Claudia Campos ◽  
Sarah E. Bloom ◽  
Jennifer R. Weyman ◽  
Anna R. Garcia
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Schedules

Dishabituation produces interactions during multiple schedules

2004 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 419-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances K. McSweeney ◽  
Benjamin P. Kowal ◽  
Eric S. Murphy ◽  
Duane M. Isava
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Schedules

Multiple schedules.

2005 ◽  
pp. 508-584
Author(s):  
C. B. Ferster ◽  
B. F. Skinner
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Schedules

The Role of Temporal Factors in Multiple Schedules

1984 ◽  
Vol 423 (1 Timing and Ti) ◽  
pp. 597-599
Author(s):  
ALISON D. HASSIN-HERMAN
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Schedules ◽  
Temporal Factors

Multiple schedules as a model to test cue effects of drug and natural reinforcers

2014 ◽  
Vol 140 ◽  
pp. e140 ◽  
Author(s):  
William T. McCuddy ◽  
J.S. Beckmann ◽  
M.T. Bardo
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Schedules

scholarly journals SHORT-COMPONENT MULTIPLE SCHEDULES: EFFECTS OF RELATIVE REINFORCEMENT DURATION1

1975 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
William H. Merigan ◽  
Jay S. Miller ◽  
Lewis R. Gollub
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Schedules ◽  
Relative Reinforcement ◽  
Short Component

Behaviour of Rats in Multiple Schedules of Response-Contingent and Response-Independent Food Presentation

1978 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. M. Bradshaw ◽  
E. Szabadi ◽  
P. Bevan
Keyword(s):  
Negative Contrast ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Food Presentation ◽  
The Other ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
General Applicability ◽  
Response Contingent ◽  
Multiple Schedules ◽  
Two Component ◽  
Lever Pressing

During Phase I, three rats were exposed to two-component multiple schedules of response-independent food presentation. Low rates of lever-pressing were observed, and response rates in one component did not increase when food presentation was withheld in the other component. During Phase II, the same rats were exposed to two-component multiple schedules of response-contingent reinforcement. Much higher rates of lever-pressing were observed. Moreover, when reinforcement was withheld in one component, response rates in the other component increased (positive contrast), and when reinforcement was reinstated in the changed component, response rates in the other component declined (negative contrast). During Phase III, when food was again delivered independently of responding, the response rates declined again to low levels. These results indicate that the occurrence of non-instrumental lever-pressing is not a prerequisite for the occurrence of behavioural contrast in the rat, and thus cast doubt on the general applicability of the autoshaping theory of behavioural contrast

scholarly journals INSTRUCTIONS, MULTIPLE SCHEDULES, AND EXTINCTION: DISTINGUISHING RULE-GOVERNED FROM SCHEDULE-CONTROLLED BEHAVIOR

1986 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven C. Hayes ◽  
Aaron J. Brownstein ◽  
Joseph R. Haas ◽  
David E. Greenway
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Schedules
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document