communication training
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

909
(FIVE YEARS 263)

H-INDEX

53
(FIVE YEARS 4)

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 507-523
Author(s):  
Aneta Lew-Koralewicz

Communication problems are one of the symptoms of autism spectrum disorders.  Challenging behaviors may be a form of communication with the environment, and when other forms of communication are not available, they may be the only way to meet their needs. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the potential use of functional communication training in reducing problem behaviors of individuals with ASD, as well as developing acceptable ways of communication. In a research process based on behavior analysis, the method of single-subject experiment with multiple-baseline  design was used.  The results of the study show that the research participants developed communication skills on the basic level, and the frequency of their challenging behaviors has significantly decreased.


Autism ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 136236132110655
Author(s):  
Reem Muharib ◽  
Art Dowdy ◽  
Adithyan Rajaraman ◽  
Joshua Jessel

Functional communication training, an intervention for challenging behavior rooted in principles of applied behavior analysis, has copious empirical support dating back to the mid-1980s for autistic individuals. Recently, there has been a concerted effort to thin reinforcement delivery during functional communication training using contingency-based delays that, in turn, are designed to enhance practicality and feasibility while not compromising on efficacy. In this synthesis, we meta-analyzed the literature using log response ratio effect sizes to investigate (a) combined and across type effectiveness of contingency-based delays and (b) moderating variables that might impact intervention outcomes. Findings showed that contingency-based delays were effective for autistic individuals (log response ratio = −2.17; 95% CI = (−2.76, −1.58)) and most effective when the contingency incorporated positive reinforcement (log response ratio = −2.30; 95% CI = (−2.83, −1.78)). In addition, delay procedures that included differential reinforcement of alternative behavior were overall more effective (log response ratio = −2.13; 95% CI = (−2.72, −1.55)) than those that involved differential reinforcement of other behavior (log response ratio = −1.24; 95% CI = (−3.84, 1.37)). Noteworthy moderating variables found to impact contingency-based delay efficacy included the intervention dosage and the topography of behavior. We discuss these findings and highlight directions where additional empirical research is warranted to improve our understanding about contingency-based delays for autistic individuals. Lay abstract Functional communication training, an intervention for challenging behavior rooted in principles of applied behavior analysis, has copious empirical support dating back to the mid-1980s for autistic individuals. Recently, there has been a concerted effort to thin reinforcement delivery during functional communication training using contingency-based delays that, in turn, are designed to enhance practicality and feasibility while not compromising efficacy. In this synthesis, we meta-analyzed the literature base with the goal of investigating both combined and across type effectiveness of contingency-based delays. We also aimed to investigate moderating variables that might impact intervention outcomes. Findings showed that contingency-based delays were effective for individuals with an autism spectrum disorder diagnosis and most effective when the delay incorporated some form of positive reinforcement. In addition, differential reinforcement of alternative-based delays was overall more effective when compared to differential reinforcement of other behavior-based delays. Noteworthy moderating variables found to impact contingency-based delay efficacy included the intervention dosage and the topography of behavior. We discuss these findings and highlight directions where additional empirical research is warranted to improve our understanding about contingency-based delays for individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder.


Author(s):  
Heidi Preis ◽  
Elizabeth Bojsza ◽  
Laura Lindenfeld ◽  
Tong J. Gan ◽  
Susmita Pati

2021 ◽  
pp. 100012
Author(s):  
Susan Eggly ◽  
Mark Manning ◽  
Nicole Senft ◽  
Tanina Foster Moore ◽  
Terrance L. Albrecht ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 100013
Author(s):  
Sally Miller ◽  
Deborah A. Lee ◽  
Sylvie Muhimpundu ◽  
Cathy A. Maxwell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document