scholarly journals Three cases of adjacent segment disease post‐posterior spinal fusion, treated successfully by oblique lateral interbody fusion: A clinical series

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 206-210
Author(s):  
Takuya Sakamoto ◽  
Koki Abe ◽  
Sumihisa Orita ◽  
Kazuhide Inage ◽  
Miyako Suzuki ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. S181
Author(s):  
Mark Shasti ◽  
Scott J. Koenig ◽  
Luke Brown ◽  
Ehsan Jazini ◽  
Kelley E. Banagan ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 545-551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Shasti ◽  
Scott J. Koenig ◽  
Alysa B. Nash ◽  
Shahrzad Bahrami ◽  
Julio J. Jauregui ◽  
...  

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 135
Author(s):  
Tomohide Segawa ◽  
Hisashi Koga ◽  
Masahito Oshina ◽  
Katsuhiko Ishibashi ◽  
Yuichi Takano ◽  
...  

Background and objectives: Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF) is a widely performed, minimally invasive technique to achieve lumbar lateral interbody fusion. However, some complications can arise due to constraints posed by the limited surgical space and visual field. The purpose of this study was to assess the short-term postoperative clinical outcomes of microendoscopy-assisted OLIF (ME-OLIF) compared to conventional OLIF. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively investigated 75 consecutive patients who underwent OLIF or ME-OLIF. The age, sex, diagnosis, and number of fused levels were obtained from medical records. Operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and intraoperative complications were also collected. Operation time and EBL were only measured per level required for the lateral procedure, excluding the posterior fixation surgery. The primary outcome measure was assessed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). The secondary outcome measure was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the European Quality of Life–5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), measured preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. Results: This case series consisted of 14 patients in the OLIF group and 61 patients in the ME-OLIF group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the mean operative time and EBL (p = 0.90 and p = 0.50, respectively). The perioperative complication rate was 21.4% in the OLIF group and 21.3% in the ME-OLIF group (p = 0.99). In both groups, the postoperative JOABPEQ, EQ-5D, and ODI scores improved significantly (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Although there was no significant difference in clinical results between the two surgical methods, the results suggest that both are safe surgical methods and that microendoscopy-assisted OLIF could serve as a potential alternative to the conventional OLIF procedure.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 100054
Author(s):  
Kaweekrai Anusart ◽  
Kittisak Songthong ◽  
Vit Kotheeranurak ◽  
Weerasak Singhatanadgige ◽  
Worawat Limthongkul

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document