Factors associated with abuse in residential child care institutions

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Colton
Young ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-27
Author(s):  
Monika Alvestad Reime ◽  
Ingunn Barmen Tysnes

This article explores Norwegian youth experiences of and views on coercive placement in un-locked residential child care institutions. Inspired by Antonovsky’s salutogenic theory, the article discusses factors that make placement an opportunity for development among youth with serious drug and behavioural problems. The empirical material comes from interviews with 34 youth under and after coercive placement. The findings reveal that coercive placement in un-locked institutions can be helpful and necessary, provided that the institutions have the means available to protect the residents and provide supportive and meaningful treatment content. Factors such as treatment structure, the content of everyday life, clear expectations, and boundaries are discussed as important factors that help the placement to be an opportunity for development among youth with serious drug and behavioural problems.


2000 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-216
Author(s):  
Leslie B. Whitbeck

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Smith ◽  
Leon Fulcher ◽  
Peter Doran

2021 ◽  
pp. 147332502199087
Author(s):  
Lisa Warwick

This article theorises adult-child touch in residential child care as a relational practice, contributing to an emergent literature on residential child care, and conceptualises residential child care as a Lifespace. It responds to an on-going debate surrounding the use of touch in the sector, which has attracted academic attention since the early 1990s as a result of abuse scandals, the ensuing ‘no touch’ policies and a growing body of research identifying touch as an important aspect of child development. The paper draws upon a six-month ethnographic study of residential child care, which was explicitly designed to observe everyday interactions between residential care workers and young people. The findings suggest that touch cannot be discussed in isolation from either relationships or a contextual understanding of relationships in the specific context of residential child care. The study found that touch is unavoidable, relational and that dichotomous understandings of touch continue to present issues for both theory and practice.


2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Steckley ◽  
Mark Smith

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document