ChemInform Abstract: STANDARD ENTHALPIES OF FORMATION OF BIS(PENTANE-2,4-DIONATO)COPPER(II) AND TETRAKIS(BIS(PENTANE-2,4-DIONATO)COBALT(II)) AND AN ESTIMATION OF THE METAL-OXYGEN BOND ENERGIES

1981 ◽  
Vol 12 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. IRVING ◽  
M. A. V. RIBEIRO DA SILVA

Author(s):  
José A. Martinho Simões ◽  
Manuel Minas da Piedade

Although standard enthalpies of formation provide information about the net stability of molecules and their transformations, they do not always indicate stability of individual bonds. This analysis normally involves parameters, loosely called “bond energies,” that reflect the amount of energy required to cleave chemical bonds. Bond energies are essential for understanding the nature of chemical bonds. They can be used to assess the results from quantum chemistry calculations (or from other, less sophisticated theoretical models) and thus support or oppose the descriptions of those bonds. Moreover, bond energy values also enable us to estimate the driving forces of chemical reactions by considering the strengths of all the bonds that are cleaved and formed. In fact, there are many reactions for which the standard enthalpies of formation of all reactants and products are not available (and cannot be easily estimated) but whose energetics can be predicted from the appropriate bond energies. In the previous chapters, we attempted to review all the important parameters in molecular energetics, but to avoid unnecessary distraction, we deliberately omitted bond energies from the discussion. The literature is plagued with a variety of concepts that fall into that designation but are not always synonymous. We can find names like bond strengths, bond enthalpies, bond energies, bond dissociation enthalpies, bond dissociation energies, bond disruption enthalpies, bond enthalpy terms, intrinsic bond energies, and symbols like D, D̄, 〈D〉, E, BDE, and so on. The meaning of these concepts it not always obvious and, unfortunately, some are occasionally misused. Now we look into each one of them. Consider a molecule AB, where A and B can be atoms or groups of atoms.



Thermo ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-31
Author(s):  
Sumit Charaya ◽  
Joseph W. Bozzelli

Structures, thermochemical properties, bond energies, and internal rotation potentials of acetic acid hydrazide (CH3CONHNH2), acetamide (CH3CONH2), and N-methyl acetamide (CH3CONHCH3), and their radicals corresponding to the loss of hydrogen atom, have been studied. Gas-phase standard enthalpies of formation and bond energies were calculated using the DFT methods B3LYP/6-31G(d,p), B3LYP/6-31G(2d,2p) and the composite CBS-QB3 methods employing a series of work reactions further to improve the accuracy of the ΔHf°(298 K). Molecular structures, vibration frequencies, and internal rotor potentials were calculated at the DFT level. The parent molecules’ standard formation enthalpies of CH3–C=ONHNH2, CH3–C=ONH2, and CH3–C=ONHCH3 were evaluated as −27.08, −57.40, and −56.48 kcal mol−1, respectively, from the CBS–QB3 calculations. Structures, internal rotor potentials, and C–H and N–H bond dissociation energies are reported. The DFT and the CBS-QB3 enthalpy values show close agreement, and this accord is attributed to the use of isodesmic work reactions for the analysis. The agreement also suggests this combination of the B3LYP/work reaction approach is acceptable for larger molecules. Internal rotor potentials for the amides are high, ranging from 16 to 22 kcal mol−1.



1983 ◽  
Vol 61 (7) ◽  
pp. 1573-1577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan D. Westland ◽  
M. T. H. Tarafder

Enthalpies of reaction have been determined by solution calorimetry for the process 2AX(c) + ThX4(c) = A2ThX6(c) where A = K, Cs and X = Cl, Br. The measurements afforded the following values of standard enthalpies of formation [Formula: see text], in kJ mol−1: K2ThCl6, −2108; Cs2ThCl6, −2151; K2ThBr,−1774; Cs2ThBr6,−1826. The standard enthalpies of formation of ThCl62− (g), ThBr62− (g), UCl62− (g), and UBr62− (g) and the two-halide ion affinities of ThCl4, ThBr4, UCl4, and UBr4 were compared by assuming semi-empirical (Kapustinskii) values of the lattice energies of the complexes. Homolytic and heterolytic bond energies were also calculated.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document