scholarly journals Applying cumulative effects to strategically advance large‐scale ecosystem restoration

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heida L Diefenderfer ◽  
Gregory D Steyer ◽  
Matthew C Harwell ◽  
Andrew J LoSchiavo ◽  
Hilary A Neckles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Ecosystem Restoration ◽  
Cumulative Effects

scholarly journals Large Scale Ecosystem Restoration: Five Case Studies from the United States

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 151
Author(s):  
David Paull
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Case Studies ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Ecosystem Restoration ◽  
The United States

?It all comes down to leadership. You need it at all levels ? We all think we?re good at fighting. We?re not always quite as good at collaborating?.

scholarly journals Impact of cyberattacks on stock performance: a comparative study

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 637-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Tweneboah-Kodua ◽  
Francis Atsu ◽  
William Buchanan
Keyword(s):  
Cross Section ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Financial Sector ◽  
Cumulative Effects ◽  
Financial Industry ◽  
Data Breach ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Technology Firms ◽  
Tools And Techniques

Purpose The study uses cyberattacks announcements on 96 firms that are listed on S&P 500 over the period from January 03, 2013, to December 29, 2017. Design/methodology/approach The empirical analysis was performed in two ways: cross-section and industry level. The authors use statistical tests that account for the effects of cross-section correlation in returns, returns series correlation, volatility changes and skewness in the returns. Findings These imply that studying the cumulative effects of cyberattacks on prices of listed firms without grouping them into the various sectors may be non-informative; financial sector firms tend to react cumulatively to cyberattacks over a three-day period than other sectors; and technology firms tend to be less reactive to the announcement of a data breach. Such firms may possibly have the necessary tools and techniques to address large-scale cyberattacks. Research limitations/implications For cross-section analysis, the outcome shows that the market does not significantly react to cyberattacks for all the event windows, except [−30, 30], while for the sector-level analysis, the analysis offers two main results. Practical implications First, while there is a firm reaction to cyberattacks for long event window for retail sector, there is no evidence of a cumulative firm reaction to cyberattacks for both short and long event windows for the industrial, information technology and health sectors. Second, the firms in the financial sector, there is a strong evidence of cumulative reaction to cyberattacks for [−1, 1] for the financial industry, and the reactions disappear for relatively longer event windows. Social implications These imply that studying the cumulative effects of cyberattacks on prices of listed firms without grouping them into the various sectors may be non-informative, the financial sector firms tend to react cumulatively to cyberattacks over a three-day period than other sectors, technology firms tend to be less reactive to the announcement of a data breach, possibly such firms may have the necessary tools and techniques to address large-scale cyberattacks. Originality/value The work provides new insights into the effect of cyber security on stock prices.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document