Research on seismic modeling and inversion at the center for wave phenomena: Status, february, 1989

1989 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-61
Author(s):  
Norman Bleistein ◽  
Jack K. Cohen
Geophysics ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. U1-U11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Rüger ◽  
Dave Hale

In seismic processing, velocity fields are commonly represented on finely sampled Cartesian grids. Attractive alternatives are unstructured grids such as meshes composed of triangles or tetrahedra. Meshes provide a space-filling framework that enables editing of velocity models while facilitating numerical tasks such as seismic modeling and inversion. In this paper, we introduce an automated process to generate meshes of subsurface velocity structures for highly resolved velocity fields without providing additional external constraints such as horizons and faults. Our analysis shows that these new meshes can represent both smooth and discontinuous velocity profiles accurately and with less computer memory than grids.


2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alon Heimer ◽  
Israel Cohen ◽  
Anthony A. Vassiliou

Geophysics ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. SM5-SM17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kees Wapenaar

Acoustic, electromagnetic, elastodynamic, poroelastic, and electroseismic waves are all governed by a unified matrix-vector wave equation. The matrices in this equation obey the same symmetry properties for each of these wave phenomena. This implies that the wave vectors for each of these phenomena obey the same reciprocity theorems. By substituting Green’s matrices in these reciprocity theorems, unified wavefield representations are obtained. Analogous to the well-known acoustic wavefield representations, these unified representations find applications in geophysical modeling, migration, inversion, multiple elimination, and interferometry.


Author(s):  
Alfred Behle ◽  
G. Seriani ◽  
J.M. Carcione ◽  
E. Priolo ◽  
G. Jacovitti ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgios A. Tassis ◽  
Jan Steinar Rønning ◽  
Siegfried Rohdewald

Geophysics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 907-918 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johan O. A. Robertsson ◽  
Chris H. Chapman

Seismic modeling, processing, and inversion often require the calculation of the seismic response resulting from a suite of closely related seismic models. Even though changes to the model may be restricted to a small subvolume, we need to perform simulations for the full model. We present a new finite‐difference method that circumvents the need to resimulate the complete model for local changes. By requiring only calculations in the subvolume and its neighborhood, our method makes possible significant reductions in computational cost and memory requirements. In general, each source/receiver location requires one full simulation on the complete model. Following these pre‐computations, recalculation of the altered wavefield can be limited to the region around the subvolume and its neighborhood. We apply our method to a 2-D time‐lapse seismic problem, thereby achieving a factor of 15 reduction in computational cost. Potential savings for 3-D are far greater.


1984 ◽  
Vol 72 (10) ◽  
pp. 1385-1393 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.B. Wason ◽  
J.L. Black ◽  
G.A. King

Geophysics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. F65-F76
Author(s):  
Gabriel Fabien-Ouellet

New processors are increasingly supporting half-precision floating-point numbers, often with a significant throughput gain over single-precision operations. Seismic modeling, imaging, and inversion could benefit from such an acceleration, but it is not obvious how the accuracy of the solution can be preserved with a very narrow 16-bit representation. By scaling the finite-difference expression of the isotropic elastic wave equation, we have found that a stable solution can be obtained despite the very narrow dynamic range of the half-precision format.We develop an implementation with the CUDA platform, which, on most recent graphics processing units (GPU), is nearly twice as fast and uses half the memory of the equivalent single-precision version. The error on seismograms caused by the reduced precision is shown to correspond to a negligible fraction of the total seismic energy and is mostly incoherent with seismic phases. Finally, we find that this noise does not adversely impact full-waveform inversion nor reverse time migration, which both benefit from the higher throughput of half-precision computation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document