Evaluation of video self-instruction for implementing paired-stimulus preference assessments

2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 675-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Candice Hansard ◽  
Ellie Kazemi
Keyword(s):  
Paired Stimulus ◽  
Preference Assessments ◽  
Stimulus Preference ◽  
Self Instruction ◽  
Stimulus Preference Assessments

scholarly journals EVALUATION OF A SELF-INSTRUCTION PACKAGE FOR CONDUCTING STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENTS

2012 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard B. Graff ◽  
Amanda M. Karsten
Keyword(s):  
Preference Assessments ◽  
Stimulus Preference ◽  
Self Instruction ◽  
Stimulus Preference Assessments

Increasing the efficiency of paired-stimulus preference assessments by identifying categories of preference

2015 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 221-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis J. Ciccone ◽  
Richard B. Graff ◽  
William H. Ahearn
Keyword(s):  
Paired Stimulus ◽  
Preference Assessments ◽  
Stimulus Preference ◽  
Stimulus Preference Assessments

Comparing Paired-Stimulus Preference Assessments With In-the-Moment Reinforcer Analysis on Skill Acquisition: A Preliminary Investigation

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin B. Leaf ◽  
Ronald Leaf ◽  
Jeremy A. Leaf ◽  
Aditt Alcalay ◽  
Daniel Ravid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Evidence ◽  
Skill Acquisition ◽  
Preliminary Investigation ◽  
Paired Stimulus ◽  
Preference Assessments ◽  
Stimulus Preference ◽  
Multiple Dimensions ◽  
The Moment ◽  
Stimulus Preference Assessments ◽  
Expressive Labeling

Today, the use of formal preference assessments, including paired-stimulus preference assessments, is widely utilized to help determine which items to use as reinforcers during intervention. A second way to determine potential reinforcers is to analyze multiple dimensions of a stimulus in the moment, a procedure known as in-the-moment reinforcer analysis. Although paired-stimulus preference assessments are widely used, there is no experimental evidence that extensive advance preference assessments actually produce higher rates of learning than in-the-moment reinforcer analysis. The present study compared rates of learning on a simple expressive labeling task when correct responses were reinforced with items selected based on extensive formal paired-preference assessments versus items selected by a teacher using in-the-moment analysis of reinforcer effects. The results indicated no clear difference in skill acquisition, but there were clear differences in terms of efficiency and maintenance.

The Use of Stimulus Preference Assessments to Determine Procedural Acceptability for Participants

2021 ◽  
pp. 109830072110426
Author(s):  
Rachelle N. Huntington ◽  
Ilene S. Schwartz
Keyword(s):  
Social Validity ◽  
Preference Assessment ◽  
Paired Stimulus ◽  
Primary Role ◽  
Preference Assessments ◽  
Stimulus Preference ◽  
Task Behavior ◽  
Stimulus Preference Assessment ◽  
The Social ◽  
Stimulus Preference Assessments

The social validity of behavior intervention is rooted in consumer perception. This information is typically garnered through questionnaires and interviews conducted with relevant consumers such as teachers or caregivers. Often, the participants (i.e., the individuals with disabilities receiving the intervention) play less of a role in the assessment of social validity, despite their primary role in intervention. This study examines a procedure for including participants in the assessment of social validity, namely procedural acceptability. Three participants selected their preferred intervention in a paired stimulus preference assessment. Videos presented the intervention options, and participants’ preferred interventions were implemented. These interventions decreased target behavior(s) and increased on-task behavior for all participants. The article concludes with a discussion of implications for use of this procedure and considerations for including participants in social validity assessments.

Stimulus preference assessments and the utility of a moderate category

2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis J. Ciccone ◽  
Richard B. Graff ◽  
William H. Ahearn
Keyword(s):  
Preference Assessments ◽  
Stimulus Preference ◽  
Stimulus Preference Assessments

Training staff to implement brief stimulus preference assessments

2014 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 214-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina R. Weldy ◽  
John T. Rapp ◽  
Kelli Capocasa
Keyword(s):  
Preference Assessments ◽  
Stimulus Preference ◽  
Stimulus Preference Assessments

An evaluation of video modeling with embedded instructions to teach implementation of stimulus preference assessments

2014 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 209-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rocío Rosales ◽  
Leah Gongola ◽  
Christa Homlitas
Keyword(s):  
Video Modeling ◽  
Preference Assessments ◽  
Stimulus Preference ◽  
Stimulus Preference Assessments

Using Conditional Percentages During Free-Operant Stimulus Preference Assessments to Predict the Effects of Preferred Items on Stereotypy

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 740-765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyla M. Frewing ◽  
John T. Rapp ◽  
Sarah J. Pastrana
Keyword(s):  
Preference Assessments ◽  
Stimulus Preference ◽  
Free Operant ◽  
Stimulus Preference Assessments

The Use of Stimulus Preference Assessments for Persons with Neurocognitive Disorder: A Literature Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Wagner ◽  
Jeffrey A. Buchanan ◽  
Jordan Bailey ◽  
Felicia J. Andresen ◽  
Christina Omlie
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Neurocognitive Disorder ◽  
Preference Assessments ◽  
Stimulus Preference ◽  
Stimulus Preference Assessments
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document