Utility of the multiple-stimulus without replacement procedure and stability of preferences of older adults with dementia

2013 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 765-780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paige B. Raetz ◽  
Linda A. LeBlanc ◽  
Jonathan C. Baker ◽  
Laura C. Hilton
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Multiple Stimulus Without Replacement ◽  
Replacement Procedure ◽  
Multiple Stimulus ◽  
Stability Of Preferences

Using Multiple-Stimulus Without Replacement Preference Assessments to Increase Student Engagement and Performance

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-10
Author(s):  
Adam D. Weaver ◽  
Brian C. McKevitt ◽  
Allie M. Farris
Keyword(s):  
Student Engagement ◽  
Academic Outcomes ◽  
Emotional And Behavioral Disorders ◽  
Preference Assessment ◽  
Preference Assessments ◽  
Multiple Stimulus Without Replacement ◽  
Multiple Stimulus ◽  
History Of ◽  
And Performance

Multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessment is a research-based method for identifying appropriate rewards for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. This article presents a brief history of how this technology evolved and describes a step-by-step approach for conducting the procedure. A discussion of necessary materials and data sheets is included. Finally, a case study is presented to illustrate how the procedure can be used to improve behavioral and academic outcomes.

Multiple Stimulus Without Replacement Preference Assessment for Students With Emotional and Behavioral Disorders

2021 ◽  
pp. 105345122110510
Author(s):  
Jodee Prudente ◽  
MaryAnn Demchak
Keyword(s):  
Problem Behaviors ◽  
Behavioral Disorders ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Rank Order ◽  
Emotional And Behavioral Disorders ◽  
Behavioral Assessment ◽  
Preference Assessment ◽  
Multiple Stimulus Without Replacement ◽  
Multiple Stimulus ◽  
Practical Guidelines

Students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) generally have behavior support plans that are based on a functional behavioral assessment. This article provides educators practical guidelines for conducting a multiple stimulus without replacement (MSWO) preference assessment to rank order preferred activities that will align with the function of behavior for use in behavioral interventions. The use of highly preferred reinforcers to reduce student problem behaviors can enhance educational outcomes for the student.

Validity of the multiple‐stimulus without replacement preference assessment for edible items

2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 1688-1701
Author(s):  
Jennifer N. Fritz ◽  
Christopher T. Roath ◽  
Patricia T. Shoemaker ◽  
A. Blair Edwards ◽  
Louisa A. Hussein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Preference Assessment ◽  
Multiple Stimulus Without Replacement ◽  
Multiple Stimulus

Multiple Stimulus Without Replacement Preference Assessments: An Examination of the Relation Between Session Number and Effectiveness

2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 337-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher A. Tullis ◽  
Helen I. Cannella-Malone ◽  
Courtney V. Fleming
Keyword(s):  
Preference Assessments ◽  
Multiple Stimulus Without Replacement ◽  
Multiple Stimulus

Evaluation of a Self-Instructional Manual to Teach Multiple-Stimulus Without Replacement Preference Assessments

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 289-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duong Ramon ◽  
C. T. Yu ◽  
Garry L. Martin ◽  
Toby Martin
Keyword(s):  
Preference Assessments ◽  
Multiple Stimulus Without Replacement ◽  
Multiple Stimulus ◽  
Instructional Manual

scholarly journals An Evaluation of a Brief Video-Based Multiple-Stimulus Without Replacement Preference Assessment

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew T. Brodhead ◽  
Monerah N. Al-Dubayan ◽  
Meredith Mates ◽  
Emily A. Abel ◽  
Lauren Brouwers
Keyword(s):  
Preference Assessment ◽  
Multiple Stimulus Without Replacement ◽  
Multiple Stimulus

An Evaluation of a Brief Multiple-Stimulus Without Replacement Preference Assessment Conducted in an Electronic Pictorial Format

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 417-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew T. Brodhead ◽  
Emily A. Abel ◽  
Monerah N. Al-Dubayan ◽  
Lauren Brouwers ◽  
Gina Warren Abston ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Preference Assessment ◽  
Multiple Stimulus Without Replacement ◽  
Multiple Stimulus

An alternate scoring method for the multiple stimulus without replacement preference assessment

2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis J. Ciccone ◽  
Richard B. Graff ◽  
William H. Ahearn
Keyword(s):  
Preference Assessment ◽  
Scoring Method ◽  
Multiple Stimulus Without Replacement ◽  
Multiple Stimulus

scholarly journals Differences in Auditory Perception Between Young and Older Adults When Controlling for Differences in Hearing Loss and Cognition

2022 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 233121652110661
Author(s):  
Jennifer J. Lentz ◽  
Larry E. Humes ◽  
Gary R. Kidd
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Stream Segregation ◽  
Group Differences ◽  
Perceptual Skills ◽  
Multiple Stimulus ◽  
Masking Level Difference ◽  
Hearing Assessment ◽  
Modulation Detection ◽  
Modulation Detection Interference

This study was designed to examine age effects on various auditory perceptual skills using a large group of listeners (155 adults, 121 aged 60–88 years and 34 aged 18–30 years), while controlling for the factors of hearing loss and working memory (WM). All subjects completed 3 measures of WM, 7 psychoacoustic tasks (24 conditions) and a hearing assessment. Psychophysical measures were selected to tap phenomena thought to be mediated by higher-level auditory function and included modulation detection, modulation detection interference, informational masking (IM), masking level difference (MLD), anisochrony detection, harmonic mistuning, and stream segregation. Principal-components analysis (PCA) was applied to each psychoacoustic test. For 6 of the 7 tasks, a single component represented performance across the multiple stimulus conditions well, whereas the modulation-detection interference (MDI) task required two components to do so. The effect of age was analyzed using a general linear model applied to each psychoacoustic component. Once hearing loss and WM were accounted for as covariates in the analyses, estimated marginal mean thresholds were lower for older adults on tasks based on temporal processing. When evaluated separately, hearing loss led to poorer performance on roughly 1/2 the tasks and declines in WM accounted for poorer performance on 6 of the 8 psychoacoustic components. These results make clear the need to interpret age-group differences in performance on psychoacoustic tasks in light of cognitive declines commonly associated with aging, and point to hearing loss and cognitive declines as negatively influencing auditory perceptual skills.

Multiple-Stimulus without Replacement Preference Assessment: Reducing the Number of Sessions to Identify Preferred Stimuli

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 469-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Richman ◽  
Lucy Barnard-Brak ◽  
Layla Abby ◽  
Laura Grubb
Keyword(s):  
Preference Assessment ◽  
Multiple Stimulus Without Replacement ◽  
Multiple Stimulus
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document