Soil methane (CH 4 ) fluxes in cropland with permanent pasture and riparian buffer strips with different vegetation #

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerry Celumusa Dlamini ◽  
Laura Cárdenas ◽  
Eyob Habte Tesfamariam ◽  
Robert Dunn ◽  
Jane Hawkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Riparian Buffer ◽  
Buffer Strips ◽  
Permanent Pasture ◽  
Riparian Buffer Strips

Managing riparian buffer strips to optimise ecosystem services: A review

2020 ◽  
Vol 296 ◽  
pp. 106891 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorna J. Cole ◽  
Jenni Stockan ◽  
Rachel Helliwell
Keyword(s):  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
Riparian Buffer ◽  
Buffer Strips ◽  
Riparian Buffer Strips

The influence of riparian buffer strips on carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) assemblage structure and diversity in intensively managed grassland fields

2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 2233-2245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorna J. Cole ◽  
Ruth Morton ◽  
William Harrison ◽  
David I. McCracken ◽  
Duncan Robertson
Keyword(s):  
Assemblage Structure ◽  
Carabid Beetle ◽  
Riparian Buffer ◽  
Buffer Strips ◽  
Riparian Buffer Strips ◽  
Intensively Managed

Elevated numbers of flying insects and insectivorous birds in riparian buffer strips

2000 ◽  
Vol 78 (5) ◽  
pp. 740-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darroch M Whitaker ◽  
Allan L Carroll ◽  
William A Montevecchi
Keyword(s):  
Abies Balsamea ◽  
Agricultural Landscapes ◽  
Riparian Buffer ◽  
Buffer Strips ◽  
Insectivorous Birds ◽  
Size Classes ◽  
Clear Cutting ◽  
Flying Insects ◽  
Riparian Buffer Strips ◽  
Capture Rates

We compared the abundances of flying insects along undisturbed lakeshores and riparian buffer strips in balsam fir (Abies balsamea) forests in western Newfoundland. Insects were collected in pan traps placed on the forest floor and tanglefoot (sticky) traps suspended within the live canopy. Significantly greater numbers of insects were captured in riparian buffer strips than in undisturbed shorelines for four of five size classes in the canopy and two of five size classes in the understory. Collections were dominated by adult Diptera and Hymenoptera. Mean capture rates along buffer strips were 120-200% of the mean capture rates along undisturbed shorelines. This increase was greatest for large-bodied insects. A likely explanation for our observations is that buffer strips act as windbreaks, collecting airborne insects blown in from adjacent clearcuts and lakes. This phenomenon has been widely documented in agricultural landscapes. Understory wind speed was generally greater along buffer strips than controls, which is a reflection of increased exposure caused by clear-cutting. A concurrent parallel study conducted at the same sites investigated the effects of riparian buffering on breeding bird assemblages. Ubiquitous insectivorous birds, including the yellow-rumped warbler (Dendroica coronata) and blackpoll warbler (Dendroica striata), were more abundant along buffer strips than undisturbed shorelines, possibly in response to increased prey availability. Increased food availability may in part explain the high numbers of insectivorous birds typically observed in riparian buffer strips in boreal forests.

Understory plant diversity and biomass in hybrid poplar riparian buffer strips in pastures

New Forests ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Fortier ◽  
Daniel Gagnon ◽  
Benoit Truax ◽  
France Lambert
Keyword(s):  
Plant Diversity ◽  
Hybrid Poplar ◽  
Riparian Buffer ◽  
Buffer Strips ◽  
Riparian Buffer Strips ◽  
Understory Plant

Response to clear-cut logging by northern waterthrushes

2003 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 755-762 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian G Warkentin ◽  
Allison L Fisher ◽  
Stephen P Flemming ◽  
Shawn E Roberts
Keyword(s):  
Foraging Behaviour ◽  
Habitat Type ◽  
Riparian Buffer ◽  
Foraging Efficiency ◽  
Riparian Habitat ◽  
Buffer Strips ◽  
Clear Cut ◽  
Large Numbers ◽  
Riparian Buffer Strips ◽  
Treatment Interaction

We examined the distribution and foraging behaviour of northern waterthrushes (Seiurus noveboracensis) in recently harvested and intact landscapes of Newfoundland. Data were collected along six 1-km segments of stream and adjoining upland habitat resulting in four treatments (harvested or intact, upland or stream) with three replicates each. Although known as a riparian specialist, we found waterthrush territories equally distributed across intact upland and riparian habitats. However, few waterthrushes occupied harvested uplands, while large numbers packed into riparian buffer strips adjacent to these 5- to 10-year-old postharvest clearcuts. Arthropod abundance and biomass were highly variable between years and across the four treatments, generating significant year × treatment interaction effects. Riparian habitat (in both intact and harvested areas) had consistently greater numbers of arthropod prey and more biomass than either upland habitat type. Northern waterthrushes foraging in riparian habitat adjacent to harvested uplands had lower attack rates and more frequent long flights than waterthrushes foraging in the intact treatment types. Prolonged packing of individuals into riparian buffer strips, and apparent adverse affects on waterthrush foraging efficiency, raise concerns about the effectiveness of buffer strips for sustaining viable populations of terrestrial riparian habitat specialists.

scholarly journals TRANSPORT AND FATE OF ATRAZINE IN MIDWESTERN RIPARIAN BUFFER STRIPS

2001 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 1681-1692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alissara Reungsang ◽  
Thomas B. Moorman ◽  
Ramesh S. Kanwar
Keyword(s):  
Riparian Buffer ◽  
Buffer Strips ◽  
Riparian Buffer Strips
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document