scholarly journals Anthropogenic and Natural Disturbance Differentially Affect Sagebrush Bird Habitat Use

2020 ◽  
Vol 84 (7) ◽  
pp. 1361-1372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney J. Duchardt ◽  
David J. Augustine ◽  
Jeffrey L. Beck
Keyword(s):  
Habitat Use ◽  
Natural Disturbance ◽  
Bird Habitat

Winter Bird Habitat Use in a Heterogeneous Tallgrass Prairie

2014 ◽  
Vol 171 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian P Monroe ◽  
Timothy J O'Connell
Keyword(s):  
Habitat Use ◽  
Tallgrass Prairie ◽  
Bird Habitat

Effects of Local and Landscape Variables on Wetland Bird Habitat Use During Migration Through the Rainwater Basin

2010 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth B. Webb ◽  
Loren M. Smith ◽  
Mark P. Vrtiska ◽  
Theodore G. Lagrange
Keyword(s):  
Habitat Use ◽  
Rainwater Basin ◽  
Landscape Variables ◽  
Bird Habitat

Measures of bird habitat use and quality

Wetland Birds ◽  
1999 ◽  
pp. 199-212
Keyword(s):  
Habitat Use ◽  
Bird Habitat

scholarly journals EFFECTS OF GROUP-SELECTION OPENING SIZE ON BREEDING BIRD HABITAT USE IN A BOTTOMLAND FOREST

2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1680-1691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher E. Moorman ◽  
David C. Guynn
Keyword(s):  
Habitat Use ◽  
Group Selection ◽  
Breeding Bird ◽  
Bottomland Forest ◽  
Bird Habitat

Living on the Edge: Multi-Scale Analyses of Bird Habitat Use in Coastal Marshes of Barataria Basin, Louisiana, USA

Wetlands ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 2041-2054
Author(s):  
Brett A. Patton ◽  
John A. Nyman ◽  
Megan K. Lapeyre
Keyword(s):  
Habitat Use ◽  
Coastal Marshes ◽  
Multi Scale ◽  
Barataria Basin ◽  
Bird Habitat

Beyond incidence data: Assessing bird habitat use in indigenous working landscapes through the analysis of behavioral variation among land uses

2021 ◽  
Vol 211 ◽  
pp. 104100
Author(s):  
Rubén Ortega-Álvarez ◽  
Viviana Ruiz-Gutiérrez ◽  
Orin J. Robinson ◽  
Esteban Berrones Benítez ◽  
Israel Medina Mena ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Habitat Use ◽  
Land Uses ◽  
Behavioral Variation ◽  
Working Landscapes ◽  
Incidence Data ◽  
Bird Habitat

Population organisation in reef sharks: new variations in coastal habitat use by mobile marine predators

2016 ◽  
Vol 544 ◽  
pp. 197-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Chin ◽  
MR Heupel ◽  
CA Simpfendorfer ◽  
AJ Tobin
Keyword(s):  
Habitat Use ◽  
Coastal Habitat ◽  
Marine Predators ◽  
Reef Sharks

Habitat use of toothed whales in a marine protected area based on point process models

2019 ◽  
Vol 609 ◽  
pp. 239-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
TL Silva ◽  
G Fay ◽  
TA Mooney ◽  
J Robbins ◽  
MT Weinrich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Habitat Use ◽  
Point Process ◽  
Protected Area ◽  
Marine Protected Area ◽  
Process Models ◽  
Point Process Models

Modeling cetacean habitat use in an urban coastal area in southeastern Brazil

2020 ◽  
Vol 642 ◽  
pp. 227-240
Author(s):  
L Lodi ◽  
R Tardin ◽  
G Maricato
Keyword(s):  
Habitat Use ◽  
Protected Areas ◽  
Linear Models ◽  
Anthropogenic Activities ◽  
Buffer Zone ◽  
Humpback Whales ◽  
Southeastern Brazil ◽  
Major Influence ◽  
Cetacean Species ◽  
Few Data

Most studies of cetacean habitat use do not consider the influence of anthropogenic activities. We investigated the influence of environmental and anthropogenic variables on habitat use by humpback Megaptera novaeangliae and Bryde’s whales Balaenoptera brydei off the coast of the Brazilian city of Rio de Janeiro. Although there are 2 marine protected areas (MPAs) in this area, few data are available on cetacean habitat use or on the overlap of different cetacean species within these MPAs. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of the MPAs and propose a buffer zone to better protect the biodiversity of the study area. We conducted systematic surveys and developed spatial eigenvector generalized linear models to characterize habitat use by the species in the study area. Habitat use by humpback whales was influenced only by depth, whereas for Bryde’s whales there was the additional influence of anthropogenic variables. For Bryde’s whales, which use the area for feeding, sea surface temperature and the distance to anchorages had a major influence on habitat use. We also showed that neither of the MPAs in the study area adequately protects the hotspots of either whale species. Most of the humpback whale grid cells with high sighting predictions were located within 2 km of the MPAs, while areas of high sighting prediction of Bryde’s whales were located up to 5 km from the MPAs, closer to beaches. Our findings provide important insights for the delimitation of protected areas and zoning of the MPAs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document