Anatomic variation of the innervation of the flexor digitorum profundus muscle and its clinical implications

2009 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 498-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang-Seok Oh ◽  
Hyung-Sun Won ◽  
Kyu-Seok Lee ◽  
In-Hyuk Chung ◽  
Seung Min Kim
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Fernando Vélez‐García ◽  
Aura Cristina Arbeláez‐Quiñones ◽  
Karoll Dayanna Montealegre‐Hurtado

Folia Medica ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atoni Dogood Atoni ◽  
Charles Aidemise Oyinbo

Abstract Documented anatomical variations are important not only for the study of the subject of anatomy, but also in clinical situation. This knowledge would aid surgeons in planning a preoperative strategy for surgical procedures and reconstructive surgery. The right forearm of a 35-year-old embalmed male cadaver present a splitting of the median nerve in the proximal 1/3 of the forearm to form medial and lateral divisions that accommodate an anomalous muscle. The split median nerve reunites at the distal 1/3 and continues as a single nerve. The anomalous muscle arises by muscle fibers from flexor digitorum superficialis and inserted by tendon into flexor digitorum profundus. There was no such variation in the left forearm. The knowledge of such anatomical variations is important to clinicians and surgeons in interpreting atypical clinical presentations and avoiding unusual injury during surgery.


2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takehiko Takagi ◽  
Shinichiro Takayama ◽  
Hiroyasu Ikegami ◽  
Toshiyasu Nakamura

2012 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiichi Hokkoku ◽  
Masahiro Sonoo ◽  
Mana Higashihara ◽  
Erik Stålberg ◽  
Teruo Shimizu

2004 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 734-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen T. Reilly ◽  
Michael A. Nordstrom ◽  
Marc H. Schieber

The ability to independently move the digits is limited by peripheral as well as central factors. A central limitation to independent finger movements might arise from the inability of the human nervous system to activate motor units (MUs) that exert force on one finger without also activating MUs that exert force on adjacent fingers. Short-term synchronization between MU pairs is thought to be the result of the two motoneurons receiving common input from last-order neuronal projections. The human flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) muscle contains four subdivisions, one for each of the fingers. We hypothesized that the distribution of MU synchrony within and between subdivisions of FDP might parallel the ability to selectively activate different functional subdivisions within FDP, and the ability to flex one digit independently of another. We found that the degree of MU synchrony indeed was not uniform among the different functional subdivisions of FDP; MUs acting on ulnar digits (d5, d4) were more synchronized than MUs acting on radial digits (d2, d3). Furthermore, synchrony was observed between MU pairs where each unit acted on a different digit and was highest when both units of a pair acted on the least-independent digits (d4, d5). This indicates that the CNS does not exert completely independent control over the different functional subdivisions of FDP. The strength of synchrony appears related to the inability to produce completely independent forces or movements with the digits. These observations reflect widespread divergence of last-order inputs within the FDP motoneuron pool, and we suggest that the organization of the CNS drive to this muscle contributes to the limited ability of humans to flex one digit in isolation from other digits.


1999 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 700-703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niloy Bhadra ◽  
Michael W. Keith ◽  
P. Hunter Peckham

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document