Dose selection in seamless phase II/III clinical trials based on efficacy and safety

2009 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 917-936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter K. Kimani ◽  
Nigel Stallard ◽  
Jane L. Hutton
2011 ◽  
Vol 30 (14) ◽  
pp. 1648-1664 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Brutti ◽  
S. Gubbiotti ◽  
V. Sambucini

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Wickel ◽  
Ha-Yeun Chung ◽  
Stephanie Platzer ◽  
Thomas Lehmann ◽  
Harald Prüss ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Autoimmune encephalitis is a new spectrum of autoimmune disorders of the central nervous system (CNS), which are characterized by pathogenic autoantibodies against neuronal surface antigens. Clinical presentations range from acute to subacute encephalopathy with neurological and psychiatric symptoms, and life-threatening autonomic dysfunction in severe cases. There exist no approved therapies nor is data available from controlled clinical trials. Patients are usually treated with diverse combinations of immunotherapy. However, effect of immunotherapy on antibody-producing cells and thus on levels of pathogenic autoantibodies is insufficient. Therefore, therapeutic response is sometimes prolonged with necessity of long-time intensive care treatment and also irreversible deficits occur in severe cases. This trial will investigate the efficacy and safety of bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor known to selectively deplete plasma cells, in patients with severe autoimmune encephalitis who have been treated with rituximab with insufficient response.Methods: Generate-Boost is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled phase II trial which will be conducted in specialized neurological hospitals within the GENERATE (GErman NEtwork for Research on AuToimmune Encephalitis) network in Germany. Adult patients with severe autoimmune encephalitis (modified Rankin scale, mRS ≥ 3), autoantibodies against neuronal surface antigens, and pretreatment with rituximab are eligible for study participation. 50 patients will be randomized 1:1 and undergo up to 3 cycles (each 21 days with 4 s. c. applications) of bortezomib or placebo. All patients will receive concomitant medication with dexamethasone, acyclovir and co-trimoxazole. The primary efficacy endpoint is the mRS score 17 weeks after first treatment application. Secondary endpoints are neurocognitive function, antibody titers, markers of neuronal cell damage, length of ICU/hospital stay as well as mRS and Glasgow coma scale scores throughout the trial up to week 17. General and bortezomib-specific adverse events are monitored continuously. Discussion: The expected outcome of the study is to obtain first reliable data on a hypothesis-driven therapeutic option in severe and difficult-to-treat autoimmune encephalitis. If treatment with bortezomib is beneficial in these cases, this will be the basis for implementation in the current guidelines. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03993262. Registered June 20, 2019;https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03993262German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00017497


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byron Gajewski ◽  
Xiaqing Huang

Abstract Phase II clinical trials are primarily aimed to find the optimal dose and investigate the relation between dose and efficacy relative to standard of care (control). Therefore, before moving forward to phase III confirmatory trial, the most effective dose is needed to be identified. The primary endpoint of phase II trial is typically a binary endpoint of success or failure. The EMAX model, ubiquitous in pharmacology research, was fit for many compounds and described the data well, except for a single compound, which had nonmonotone dose–response (Thomas et al., 2014). To mitigate the risk of nonmonotone dose response one of the alternative options is Bayesian hierarchical EMAX model (Gajewski et al., 2019). The hierarchical EMAX is a Proteus dose-response model, it adapts to its environment. When dose-response is monotonic it enjoys efficiency of EMAX. When dose-response is non-monotonic the additional random effect hyperprior makes the hierarchical EMAX model more adjustable and flexible. However, the normal dynamic linear model (NDLM) is a useful model to explore dose-response relation in that the efficacy at the current dose depends on the efficacy of the previous dose(s). Previous research has compared the EMAX to the hierarchical EMAX (Gajewski et al., 2019) and the EMAX to the NDLM (Liu et al., 2017), however, the hierarchical EMAX has not been directly compared to the NDLM. The focus of this paper is to compare these models and discuss the relative merit for each of their uses for an ongoing early phase dose selection study.


2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S912
Author(s):  
A. Bongiovanni ◽  
S. Nicolini ◽  
F. Foca ◽  
M. Sansovini ◽  
I. Grassi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document