Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation

2012 ◽  
Vol 31 (15) ◽  
pp. 1572-1581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingeborg Waernbaum
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Johan Zetterqvist ◽  
Arvid Sjölander

AbstractA common goal of epidemiologic research is to study the association between a certain exposure and a certain outcome, while controlling for important covariates. This is often done by fitting a restricted mean model for the outcome, as in generalized linear models (GLMs) and in generalized estimating equations (GEEs). If the covariates are high-dimensional, then it may be difficult to well specify the model. This is an important concern, since model misspecification may lead to biased estimates. Doubly robust estimation is an estimation technique that offers some protection against model misspecification. It utilizes two models, one for the outcome and one for the exposure, and produces unbiased estimates of the exposure-outcome association if either model is correct, not necessarily both. Despite its obvious appeal, doubly robust estimation is not used on a regular basis in applied epidemiologic research. One reason for this could be the lack of up-to-date software. In this paper we describe a new


2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (17) ◽  
pp. 2324-2338
Author(s):  
Chien‐Lin Su ◽  
Russell Steele ◽  
Ian Shrier

Epidemiology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 863-871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen E. Wirth ◽  
Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen ◽  
Megan Murray

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document