An AI Approach to Dynamic Visual Field Testing

1998 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 143-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.W. Cho ◽  
X. Liu ◽  
G. Loizou ◽  
J.X. Wu
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Field Testing ◽  
Visual Field Testing

Objective Visual Field Testing

JAMA ◽  
1963 ◽  
Vol 186 (8) ◽  
pp. 767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard M. Copenhaver
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Field Testing ◽  
Visual Field Testing

Swivel Arm Perimeter for Visual Field Testing in Different Body Positions

1993 ◽  
Vol 206 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josef Flammer ◽  
Philip Hendrickson ◽  
Andrea Lietz ◽  
Daniela Stümpfig
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Field Testing ◽  
Visual Field Testing

scholarly journals fMRI-based perimetry: Single-point visual field testing and evaluation using retinotopic mapping

2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 1025-1025
Author(s):  
D. A. Poggel ◽  
J. F. Rizzo ◽  
L. J. Toth ◽  
D.-S. Kim
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Single Point ◽  
Field Testing ◽  
Visual Field Testing ◽  
Retinotopic Mapping ◽  
Testing And Evaluation

Effect of artificial tears on automated visual field testing in patients with glaucoma and dry eye

2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sibel Kocabeyoglu ◽  
Mehmet Cem Mocan ◽  
Banu Bozkurt ◽  
Murat Irkec
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Dry Eye ◽  
Field Testing ◽  
Visual Field Testing ◽  
Artificial Tears

Abstract TP245: Feasibility of Mobile, Wearable Telestroke Devices

Stroke ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Warach ◽  
Ben T King ◽  
Kristen V Chandler ◽  
Christopher Topel ◽  
Irene A Tabas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Field Testing ◽  
Field Of View ◽  
Visual Field Testing ◽  
Glass Technology ◽  
Technical Problems ◽  
Smart Glasses ◽  
Patient Interaction ◽  
Video And Audio ◽  
Strongly Agree

Background: Wearable technologies offer potential telestroke applications that are more mobile and potentially less expensive than traditional telemedicine carts. In an earlier, pilot phase of this research program the best performing software and hardware combination for transmission of encrypted video and audio streaming was selected for further testing. Method: We tested Vuzix M100 smart glasses device and Pristine EyeSight HIPAA-compliant video streaming services. The device wearers, emergency physicians, performed the NIHSS, and a remote vascular neurologist or neurology resident viewed the exam. Providers recorded their score and evaluated the functionality of the device with a standardized list of questions. Results: The device was assessed in 52 subjects. The providers wearing the device reported the device useful (Agree or Strongly Agree) in making an assessment in 79% of cases and that they could assess the patient well 90% of the time. However, the wearers also reported both distraction from and interference with patient interaction due to the device in 98% of cases evaluated. The viewers also reported finding the device useful in making an assessment of stroke symptoms in 79% of cases (a different set of 79% than the wearers), but in only 65% of cases did they Agree or Strongly Agree that they could assess the patient well. Viewers reported an inadequate field of view for visual field testing in 63% of cases. The inter-rater agreement between the wearer and viewer on the total NIHSS showed moderate agreement (κ = 0.45). Although the technology was easy to use in 92% of the assessments, technical problems (mainly connectivity lags) were reported by the wearer 46% of the time and by the viewer 31% of the time. The technology was rated inadequate for assessing patients in 1 case by the wearers and 3 cases by the viewers. Conclusion: Wearable smart glass technology is feasible in assessing stroke patients and shows promise as a telestroke solution, however interference with physician-patient interaction, limited field of view for visual field testing and connectivity glitches are perceived limitations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document