Azumaya Algebra

Author(s):  
Steven Duplij ◽  
Martin Schlichenmaier ◽  
Rolf Schimmrigk ◽  
Martin Schlichenmaier ◽  
Maxim Vybornov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
1985 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 1047-1058 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Beattie

Let R be a commutative ring, G a finite abelian group of order n and exponent m, and assume n is a unit in R. In [10], F. W. Long defined a generalized Brauer group, BD(R, G), of algebras with a G-action and G-grading, whose elements are equivalence classes of G-Azumaya algebras. In this paper we investigate the automorphisms of a G-Azumaya algebra A and prove that if Picm(R) is trivial, then these automorphisms are all, in some sense, inner.In fact, each of these “inner” automorphisms can be written as the composition of an inner automorphism in the usual sense and a “linear“ automorphism, i.e., an automorphism of the typewith r(σ) a unit in R. We then use these results to show that the group of gradings of the centre of a G-Azumaya algebra A is a direct summand of G, and thus if G is cyclic of order pr, A is the (smash) product of a commutative and a central G-Azumaya algebra.


1990 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 398-403
Author(s):  
R. Macoosh ◽  
R. Raphael

AbstractEnochs introduced and studied totally integrally closed rings in the class of commutative rings. This article studies the same question for Azumaya algebras, a study made possible by Atterton's notion of integral extensions for non-commutative rings.The main results are that Azumaya algebras are totally integrally closed precisely when their centres are, and that an Azumaya algebra over a commutative semiprime ring has a tight integral extension that is totally integrally closed. Atterton's integrality differs from that often studied but is very natural in the context of Azumaya algebras. Examples show that the results do not carry over to free normalizing or excellent extensions.


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 1055-1064 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Cheng ◽  
Hua-Lin Huang ◽  
Yuping Yang ◽  
Yinhuo Zhang
Keyword(s):  

1997 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 1873-1882 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Alfaro ◽  
George Szeto

2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-152
Author(s):  
L. H. Rowen ◽  
D. Saltman ◽  
Y. Segev ◽  
U. Vishne
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 06 (03) ◽  
pp. 505-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
LARS KADISON

Given a ring homomorphism B → A, consider its centralizer R = AB, bimodule endomorphism ring S = End BAB and sub-tensor-square ring T = (A ⊗ BA)B. Nonassociative tensoring by the cyclic modules RT or SR leads to an equivalence of categories inverse to the functors of induction of restricted A-modules or restricted coinduction of B-modules in case A | B is separable, H-separable, split or left depth two (D2). If RT or SR are projective, this property characterizes separability or splitness for a ring extension. Only in the case of H-separability is RT a progenerator, which takes the place of the key module AAe for an Azumaya algebra A. In addition, we characterize left D2 extensions in terms of the module TR, and show that the centralizer of a depth two extension is a normal subring in the sense of Rieffel as well as pre-braided commutative. For example, the notion of normality yields a version for Hopf subalgebras of the fact that normal subgroups have normal centralizers, and yields a special case of a conjecture that D2 Hopf subalgebras are normal.


2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 1449-1468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cris Negron
Keyword(s):  

1997 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 1883-1891
Author(s):  
Liu Zhongkui

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document