Photon-photon physics in the deep inelastic region

Author(s):  
T. F. Walsh
Keyword(s):  
1998 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. I. Akap’ev ◽  
A. N. Balabaev ◽  
N. A. Vasil’ev ◽  
S. V. Latyshev ◽  
V. M. Nazarov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1973 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 4142-4151
Author(s):  
M. Koca ◽  
M. S. K. Razmi
Keyword(s):  

1967 ◽  
Vol 154 (5) ◽  
pp. 1433-1437 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Levine ◽  
Jon Wright ◽  
J. A. Tjon
Keyword(s):  

1980 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 479-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.P. McPharlin ◽  
D.O. Caldwell ◽  
J.P. Cumalat ◽  
A.M. Eisner ◽  
D.L. Fancher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1972 ◽  
Vol 29 (19) ◽  
pp. 1356-1359 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. Davis ◽  
S. Hayes ◽  
R. Imlay ◽  
P. C. Stein ◽  
P. J. Wanderer
Keyword(s):  

2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (28) ◽  
pp. 4637-4658
Author(s):  
MAHIKO SUZUKI

We examine the uncertainties involved in the off-mass-shell extrapolation of the K→ππ decay amplitude with emphasis on those aspects that have so far been overlooked or ignored. Among them are initial-state interactions, choice of the extrapolated kaon field, and the relation between the asymptotic behavior and the zeros of the decay amplitude. In the inelastic region the phase of the decay amplitude cannot be determined by strong interaction alone and even its asymptotic value cannot be deduced from experiment. More a fundamental issue is intrinsic nonuniqueness of off-shell values of hadronic matrix elements in general. Though we are hampered with the complexity of intermediate-energy meson interactions, we attempt to obtain a quantitative idea of the uncertainties due to the inelastic region and find that they can be much larger than more optimistic views portray. If large uncertainties exist, they have unfortunate implications in the numerical accuracy of the computation of the direct CP violation parameter ∊′.


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 164
Author(s):  
Stephen K. Layson

The use of quasilinear utility functions in economic analyses is widespread. This paper presents an overdue clarification on the implications of quasilinear utility for two market monopoly. The paper begins by deriving the demands facing a two market monopoly from a representative consumer with quasilinear utility. Expressions are derived for the profit margins expressed solely in terms of the own and cross-price elasticities of demand. The paper also analyzes the implications of quasilinear utility for other issues in two market monopoly: pricing below marginal cost in a market, third-degree price discrimination when the monopoly products are substitutes and pricing in the inelastic region of demands.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document