Improving and Mediating Software-to-Usability Engineering Communication

Author(s):  
H. Antunes ◽  
A. Seffah ◽  
T. Radhakrishnan ◽  
S. Pestina
Author(s):  
Patricia Kristine Sheridan ◽  
Jason A Foster ◽  
Geoffrey S Frost

All Engineering Science students at the University of Toronto take the cornerstone Praxis Sequence of engineering design courses. In the first course in the sequence, Praxis I, students practice three types of engineering design across three distinct design projects. Previously the final design project had the students first frame and then develop conceptual design solutions for a self-identified challenge. While this project succeeded in providing an appropriate foundational design experience, it failed to fully prepare students for the more complex design experience in Praxis II. The project also failed to ingrain the need for clear and concise engineering communication, and the students’ lack of understanding of detail design inhibited their ability to make practical and realistic design decisions. A revised Product Design project in Praxis I was designed with the primary aims of: (a) pushing students beyond the conceptual design phase of the design process, and (b) simulating a real-world work environment by: (i) increasing the interdependence between student teams and (ii) increasing the students’ perceived value of engineering communication.


Author(s):  
Frauke Heinecke ◽  
Sandra Schering ◽  
Kai Essig

interactions ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 19-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arlene F. Aucella

2006 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 841-858 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W. Helms ◽  
James D. Arthur ◽  
Deborah Hix ◽  
H. Rex Hartson

2021 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 132-142
Author(s):  
Paolo Masci ◽  
Sandy Weininger

Abstract This article reports on the development of usability engineering recommendations for next-generation integrated interoperable medical devices. A model-based hazard analysis method is used to reason about possible design anomalies in interoperability functions that could lead to use errors. Design recommendations are identified that can mitigate design problems. An example application of the method is presented based on an integrated medical system prototype for postoperative care. The AAMI/UL technical committee used the results of the described analysis to inform the creation of the Interoperability Usability Concepts, Annex J, which is included in the first edition of the new ANSI/AAMI/UL 2800-1:2019 standard on medical device interoperability. The presented work is valuable to experts developing future revisions of the interoperability standard, as it documents key aspects of the analysis method used to create part of the standard. The contribution is also valuable to manufacturers, as it demonstrates how to perform a model-based analysis of use-related aspects of a medical system at the early stages of development, when a concrete implementation of the system is not yet available.


Author(s):  
Fei Huang ◽  
Jon Titus ◽  
Allan Wolinski ◽  
Kevin Schneider ◽  
Jim A. Carter

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document