Transradial Approach for Carotid Artery Stenting

2013 ◽  
pp. 117-127
Author(s):  
Tift Mann ◽  
Sasko Kedev
2010 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 268-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tejas Patel ◽  
Sanjay Shah ◽  
Alok Ranjan ◽  
Hemant Malhotra ◽  
Samir Pancholy ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (C) ◽  
pp. 24
Author(s):  
Damian Maciejewski* ◽  
Lukasz Tekieli ◽  
Anna Kablak-Ziembicka ◽  
Piotr Paluszek ◽  
Mariusz Trystula ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 60 (17) ◽  
pp. B58
Author(s):  
Sasko Kedev ◽  
Slobodan Antov ◽  
Danica Petkoska ◽  
Tift Mann

2015 ◽  
Vol 116 (6) ◽  
pp. 977-981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sasko Kedev ◽  
Danica Petkoska ◽  
Biljana Zafirovska ◽  
Ivan Vasilev ◽  
Olivier F. Bertrand

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichi HARAGUCHI ◽  
Kentarou TOYAMA ◽  
Mariko NAGAI ◽  
Nobuki MATSUURA ◽  
Takeo ITOU ◽  
...  

VASA ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 468-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dahm ◽  
van Buuren ◽  
Hansen ◽  
Becker ◽  
Wolpers

Background: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) from the femoral approach can be anatomically very difficult and the incidence of complications is higher in patients with anatomical variations of the aortic arch, difficulties related to peripheral vascular disease and/or with access site complications. Because the typical morphology in patients with a bovine- or type-III aortic arch applies for an arterial access from the right upper extremity (e.g. radial, brachial) we evaluated success rates and safety of the right transradial access in a prospective study. Patients and methods: Between June 2009 and October 2010, seventeen patients (mean age 74,4 ± 9 years, 10 male) with a bovine- (n = 4) or type-III aortic arch (n = 12) underwent CAS with a planned transradial- (n = 3) or after problematic transfemoral access (n = 14). In patients with a type-III aortic arch (n = 13), the right target common carotid artery (CCA) was cannulated from the right radial artery with a 5F IMA diagnostic catheter-, in patients with a bovine aortic arch (n = 4), the left CCA was accessed from the right radial artery with a 5F Amplatz- or Judkins left catheter. In all patients a 6F- (n = 14) or 5F- (n = 3) shuttle sheath was inserted via the diagnostic catheter and a 0.035” extra-stiff guidewire. All interventions were carried out with the use of a peripheral embolization protection device (EPD). Primary study endpoints were procedural success and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), secondary endpoints were access site complications and the mean intervention time. Results: Procedural success could be achieved in all patients (100 %), MACCE and access site complications did not occur in any patient. Mean interventional time was 48 ± 18 min. Conclusions: CAS using the right transradial approach for left CAS in bovine-type aortic arch or the right transradial approach in type-III aortic arch for right CAS appears to be safe and technically feasible.


2012 ◽  
Vol 80 (7) ◽  
pp. 1081-1087 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholena Etxegoien ◽  
Diana Rhyne ◽  
Sasko Kedev ◽  
Ravish Sachar ◽  
Tift Mann

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document