Basic Open Rhinoplasty: Incisions and Skeletonization

2021 ◽  
pp. 199-223
Author(s):  
Fabio Meneghini
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Arin Ozturk ◽  
Suleyman Eroglu ◽  
Timur Batmaz ◽  
A. Emre İlhan ◽  
Sercan Gode

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (10) ◽  
pp. NP144-NP146
Author(s):  
Mehmet Çelik ◽  
Kadir Serkan Orhan
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Gholamhossein Adham ◽  
Seied Omid Keyhan ◽  
Hamid Reza Fallahi ◽  
Heliya Ziaei ◽  
Mohan Thomas

Abstract Background Nasal sill is one of the components of the alar ring, affecting the esthetic outcomes of rhinoplasty; accordingly, we developed a novel technique to adjust defects in this area and compared it with the available techniques. Methods Our technique was based on creating a tunnel access to the nasal sill area through an incision made in the lower third of the columella using the open approach or through a nostril base incision in patients, who underwent alar base reduction, followed by insertion of a cartilaginous graft into the marked defect area. Results A total number of 54 patients with a defect in the nasal sill area were included in this study. Thirty-one patients underwent open rhinoplasty with the sill approach from the lower third of the columella, while 23 patients underwent rhinoplasty with a nostril base approach for nasal sill augmentation procedure. There were no reports of patient dissatisfaction, infection, bleeding, sensory dysfunction, or remaining asymmetry of the sill area. Conclusion Based on the findings of the present study, this technique can be successfully used in reconstructing the nasal sill area with minimal complications and morbidity.


2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 471-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Müge Koşucu ◽  
Şahin Ömür ◽  
Ahmet Beşir ◽  
Muhammet Uraloğlu ◽  
Murat Topbaş ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 131-136
Author(s):  
Laurence T Glickman ◽  
Gene W Lee

LT Glickman, GW Lee. The modified open rhinoplasty. Can J Plast Surg 1993;1(3):131-136. Despite considerable attention in the past 10 to 20 years, the open rhinoplasty remains a controversial procedure. Advocates of this technique argue that the exposure and thus the surgical manoeuvres it makes are unequalled. Detractors argue that the transcolumellar scar left by the procedure is unacceptable and is most often unnecessary. This report describes a modification of the open rhinoplasty which has most of the advantages of the open approach, but is performed without the external incision. The procedure, its advantages and drawbacks, and comparisons among the modified open, open and closed rhinoplasty are described. It is concluded that the modified open rhinoplasty is an excellent surgical approach that can be used on most patients and that it provides wide exposure without an external incision.


2014 ◽  
pp. 365-386
Author(s):  
Jaimie DeRosa
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document