Silent Sinus Syndrome

Author(s):  
Ryan E. Little ◽  
Rodney J. Schlosser
2021 ◽  
pp. 194589242198916
Author(s):  
Henry D. Zheng ◽  
Jeffrey C. Mecham ◽  
Yassmeen Abdel-Aty ◽  
Devyani Lal ◽  
Michael J. Marino

Background The histopathology and microbiology associated with silent sinus syndrome (SSS) have not been well described. Objective This study details the histopathological and microbiological characteristics in addition to radiographic findings of SSS in comparison to those of chronic maxillary sinusitis (CRS). Methods 42 patients diagnosed with SSS at Mayo Clinic Hospital in Arizona were identified. Paranasal computed tomography scans of the 42 SSS patients as well as 42 matched CRS patients were analyzed in order to assess differences in the prevalence of septal spurs/deviation. 20 of the SSS patients and 19 of the matched CRS patients also had histopathology and microbiology reports, which were compiled and summarized. Additionally, 19 SSS and 19 matched CRS patients were contacted via phone survey for a more complete patient history regarding maxillary dental disease/surgery. Results SSS patients have a significantly higher prevalence of septal spurs/deviation than CRS patients. The microbiomes of SSS patients more closely resemble those of healthy controls than those of CRS patients. Analysis of the histopathology of SSS reveals chronic, non-specific inflammation similar to that seen in non-eosinophilic CRS without polyps. SSS patients were significantly more likely to have a history of maxillary dental disease requiring surgery. Conclusion These data support the hypothesis that the pathogenesis of SSS is more likely due to anatomical/mechanical factors than inflammatory/microbiological factors.


2000 ◽  
Vol 79 (8) ◽  
pp. 576-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott M. Hunt ◽  
Thomas A. Tami

1995 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 261-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger A. Dailey ◽  
James I. Cohen

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Rosa ◽  
Rosário Figueirinhas ◽  
Jorge Oliveira ◽  
Cecília Almeida e Sousa

2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 347-348
Author(s):  
C. Brochart ◽  
S. Blanpain ◽  
P. Lehmann ◽  
A. Smail ◽  
F. Demuynck ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (10) ◽  
pp. e371-e374
Author(s):  
W. Boucenna ◽  
M. Delbarre ◽  
H. Morfeq ◽  
F. Audren ◽  
B. Jany ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Thomas ◽  
Scott M. Graham ◽  
Keith D. Carter ◽  
Jeffrey A. Nerad

Background Enophthalmos in a patient with an opacified hypoplastic maxillary sinus, without sinus symptomatology, describes the silent sinus syndrome. A current trend is to perform endoscopic maxillary antrostomy and orbital floor reconstruction as a single-staged operation. A two-staged approach is performed at our institution to avoid placement of an orbital floor implant in the midst of potential infection and allow for the possibility that enophthalmos and global ptosis may resolve with endoscopic antrostomy alone, obviating the need for orbital floor reconstruction. Methods A retrospective review identified four patients with silent sinus syndrome evaluated between June 1999 and August 2001. Patients presented to our ophthalmology department with ocular asymmetry, and computerized tomography (CT) scanning confirmed the diagnosis in each case. Results There were three men and one woman, with ages ranging from 27 to 40 years. All patients underwent endoscopic maxillary antrostomy. Preoperative enophthalmos determined by Hertel's measurements ranged from 3 to 4 mm. After endoscopic maxillary antrostomy, the range of reduction in enophthalmos was 1–2 mm. Case 2 had a preoperative CT scan and a CT scan 9 months after left endoscopic maxillary antrostomy. Volumetric analysis of the left maxillary sinus revealed a preoperative volume of 16.85 ± 0.06 cm3 and a postoperative volume of 19.56 ± 0.07 cm3. This represented a 16% increase in maxillary sinus volume postoperatively. Orbital floor augmentation was avoided in two patients because of satisfactory improvement in enophthalmos. In the other two patients, orbital reconstruction was performed as a second-stage procedure. There were no complications. Conclusion Orbital floor augmentation can be offered as a second-stage procedure for patients with silent sinus syndrome. Some patients’ enophthalmos may improve with endoscopic antrostomy alone.


2017 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 150-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Farneti ◽  
Vittorio Sciarretta ◽  
Giovanni Macrì ◽  
Ottavio Piccin ◽  
Ernesto Pasquini

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 42
Author(s):  
Franklin Bouthenet ◽  
Samy Amroun ◽  
Narcisse Zwetyenga

Introduction: Chronic maxillary atelectasis refers to a persistent volume decrease of the maxillary sinus by inward bowing of its walls. When associated with hypoglobus or enophthalmos, some authors use the term “silent sinus syndrome”. We aimed to report a case of accidental diagnosis of chronic maxillary atelectasis while investigating and treating a recurrent oroantral fistula. Observation: CT imaging showed a large bone defect and stage II chronic maxillary atelectasis. Closure of the oroantral fistula was performed with a combined surgical approach: functional endoscopic surgery and buccal fat pad flap. The follow up at 2 months showed no signs of recurrent oroantral fistula. Commentaries: Chronic maxillary atelectasis is separated into three stages, membranous deformity (stage I), bony deformity (stage II), and clinical deformity (stage III). The term silent sinus syndrome should be abandoned for stage III chronic maxillary atelectasis to allow for better collaboration between medical practitioners. Recurrent oroantral fistulas should be treated with a combined approach including endoscopic antrostomy and local flap. Conclusion: The association of functional endoscopic surgery and buccal fat pad flap were the key to success in this case allowing for oroantral fistula closure and treatment of chronic maxillary atelectasis.


Author(s):  
Rusetsky Yuri ◽  
Malyavina Ulyana ◽  
Alekseenko Svetlana ◽  
Latysheva Elena

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document